Change log

Queen's University at Kingston

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Claims7Sources6

University page Public JSON

Queen's University at Kingston currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # Queen's University at Kingston AI policy record
2+privacy: Queen's guidance directs users working with internal or confidential data to use only Queen's-approved AI tools such as LibreChat and Microsoft Copilot with Queen's single sign-on.
3+Evidence (en, bea8795eac2b): If you are using internal or confidential data, use only Queen’s-approved AI tools like LibreChat and Microsoft Copilot with Queen’s single sign-on. If only general data is involved, external tools may be acceptable with caution.
4+security_review: Queen's AI Applications page states that the university has conducted security and privacy assessments for generative AI software and uses those assessments to identify risks and inform use guidelines.
5+Evidence (en, a405e5fe4a01): To ensure the safe and appropriate use of generative AI software, the university has conducted a series of security and privacy assessments through the Security Assessment Process (SAP). These evaluations help identify potential risks, protect user privacy and institutional data, and inform appropriate use guidelines.
6+teaching: Queen's common course policies state that course outlines will include a statement indicating whether generative AI tools are permitted in a course and under what conditions.
7+Evidence (en, 480444131c2f): Statement and Guidance for Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools Your course outline will include a statement indicating whether generative AI tools are permitted in your course and under what conditions. Review that statement carefully and speak with your instructor if you have questions.
8+other: Queen's describes responsible generative AI use through five guiding principles for students, staff, and faculty, including checks for whether a use is prohibited, permitted, encouraged, or required.
9+Evidence (en, bea8795eac2b): Queen’s promotes the responsible use of generative AI across our community and has defined five guiding principles to help students, staff, and faculty make informed, effective decisions about integrating it into their work. Each principle below includes quick self-assessment questions to help users judge whether a use is prohibited, permitted, encouraged, or required.
10+teaching: Queen's CTL guidance says instructors should specify parameters for AI tool use in courses and advise on terms of use through a syllabus statement.
11+Evidence (en, 72543ea6a608): Provide students guidance: Instructors should specify the parameters for AI tool use in their courses and advise on terms of use via a syllabus statement. Academic integrity: Unauthorized use of generative AI is considered a departure from academic integrity.
12+academic_integrity: Queen's Library Generative AI guide says unauthorized use of generative AI tools is considered a departure from academic integrity.
13+Evidence (en, 752c29838615): As of July 2024: There is no overall ban on the use of generative AI tools. Instructors should provide students with specific parameters for AI use in the course syllabus. Unauthorized use of generative AI tools is considered a "departure from academic integrity."
14+privacy: Queen's Library Generative AI privacy guide warns users not to assume that data input into an AI tool is private and confidential.
15+Evidence (en, 3aa978e6c425): Always read the terms of use or privacy statements of the AI tool you're using. Some AI tools will use your inputted data (and the associated output) to further train or audit their models. Do not assume that any data you input into an AI tool is private and confidential.

Claim changes

7 claim records

privacy

Queen's guidance directs users working with internal or confidential data to use only Queen's-approved AI tools such as LibreChat and Microsoft Copilot with Queen's single sign-on.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

Queen's AI Applications page states that the university has conducted security and privacy assessments for generative AI software and uses those assessments to identify risks and inform use guidelines.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Queen's common course policies state that course outlines will include a statement indicating whether generative AI tools are permitted in a course and under what conditions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

other

Queen's describes responsible generative AI use through five guiding principles for students, staff, and faculty, including checks for whether a use is prohibited, permitted, encouraged, or required.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Queen's CTL guidance says instructors should specify parameters for AI tool use in courses and advise on terms of use through a syllabus statement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Queen's Library Generative AI guide says unauthorized use of generative AI tools is considered a departure from academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Queen's Library Generative AI privacy guide warns users not to assume that data input into an AI tool is private and confidential.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen