记录修订

Yonsei University

这里记录本站已审核资料的更新,不代表学校发布了新政策。

本站发布时间不等于学校政策生效时间。

修订版本: qs46-50-v6-r1-20261023 ·

前一记录修订: public-release-20260924-002

这次记录更新意味着什么

结构化记录概览

涉及 12 条 (更正/调整 3 · 补录 8 · 暂缓 1)

学术诚信 · 教学 · 另 8 个主题

本次修订尚无经独立审核的摘要。

这是历史记录摘要,不确认当前使用权限,也不证明学校发布了新规。

课程作业 · 涉及 1 条 (补录 1)

本站补录

新增

The2025 instructor guideline assigns the course instructor the choice of prohibition, limited uses or broader uses, announced in syllabus and class. Example syllabus texts are options, not universal student permission.

考试 · 涉及 1 条 (补录 1)

本站补录

新增

The2025 teacher guideline generally prohibits GenAI in supervised exams and limits electronic devices. In unproctored/open assessments, any permitted uses must be decided and announced beforehand. Preserve the “in principle” qualification and actual exam instructions.

使用披露 · 涉及 1 条 (补录 1)

本站补录

新增

Where AI use is permitted, the instructor selects and announces one or more disclosure/log methods. Prompt fields, versions and upload examples are selected course methods, not a universal checklist.

数据安全 · 涉及 1 条 (补录 1)

本站补录

新增

The2025 guidance warns against inputting personal/confidential/unpublished research or patent information into external cloud AI. Teachers should not upload entire student assessment texts for AI grading/analysis. No retention duration or approved institutional service is established.

研究与发表 · 涉及 1 条 (补录 1)

本站补录

新增

The2025 researcher guideline does not recognise AI as author. Humans retain core design/analysis/conclusions and responsibility; disclose tool/version/developer/purpose, verify outputs and follow journal requirements. Core original outputs may not be generated by AI under the stated restriction.

学术诚信 · 涉及 5 条 (更正/调整 2 · 补录 3)

本站更正

本站结论文字对照
旧文本

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance says students using generative AI in academic work must provide clear and accurate citations.

新文本

Yonsei’s May 2024 guideline asks students to clearly cite generative AI use; the August 2025 instructor guideline requires instructors to specify permissible course uses and choose and announce appropriate disclosure or prompt-record submission methods.

本站更正

本站结论文字对照
旧文本

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance tells students that generative AI may be permitted or restricted depending on the course and that students should consult the syllabus and course policies.

新文本

Yonsei students should follow the instructor’s announced syllabus/course AI-use rules; the August 2025 instructor guideline also addresses permitted and prohibited exam contexts and disclosure when use is allowed.

本站补录

新增

AI detector results are supplementary and should not alone determine grades or sanctions; consider the student’s explanation and instructor review. General grading dishonesty rules do not make every AI use cheating.

本站补录

新增

The2026 academic rules require scholarly ethics and allow discipline under their conditions. The undergraduate grading page says dishonesty/cheating invalidates obtained grades and gives the course F. No universal AI-specific penalty follows without the applicable course rule and finding.

本站补录

新增

The research-integrity committee process is for research participants, not ordinary course appeals. Preliminary investigation starts within30 days of report and finishes within30 of start; main investigation starts within30 after approval and finishes within120, extendable with approval. Objection is within30 days of determination notice and processed within60 of receipt. Day types are unspecified.

教学 · 涉及 1 条 (暂缓 1)

暂缓/移出当前结论

保留历史文字,不代表学校撤销了规则。

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance says generative AI use in courses should be based on clear agreement between instructors and learners, with instructors giving minimum guidance when use is permitted.

暂缓/移出当前结论
隐私 · 涉及 1 条 (更正/调整 1)

本站更正

本站结论文字对照
旧文本

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance warns users not to enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable information into generative AI tools.

新文本

Yonsei’s 2024 guideline discourages entering confidential, sensitive or personal data into generative AI; the August 2025 researcher guideline specifically warns against entering personal, patent, confidential and unpublished research data into external cloud-based AI services.

官方来源 · 来源检查