新增
UNR teaching guidance says AI detection tools are not fully reliable and should not be used as the sole determining factor for deciding whether an AI-related academic standards violation occurred.
记录修订
这里记录本站已审核资料的更新,不代表学校发布了新政策。
本站发布时间不等于学校政策生效时间。
涉及 7 条 (补录 7)
隐私 · 学术诚信 · 另 3 个主题
UNR teaching guidance says AI detection tools are not fully reliable and should not be used as the sole determining factor for deciding whether an AI-related academic standards violation occurred.
UNR Library's APA guide says AI-generated works must be cited when used as a quoted, paraphrased, or otherwise incorporated source, while process uses such as brainstorming or proofreading should be acknowledged rather than cited.
UNR's Academic Standards policy defines cheating to include unauthorized use of generative AI content generators or generative AI tools.
UNR teaching guidance recommends that instructors include an AI statement in the syllabus and discuss with students what AI use is and is not allowed for classes and course assignments.
UNR strongly advises users not to share sensitive, confidential, or regulated data with AI tools, because tool data-sharing practices may compromise confidentiality.
UNR directs users to initiate an OIT Compliance vendor risk management assessment before integrating an AI tool into daily tasks.
UNR's OIT AI usage policy applies to students, employees, contractors, and third parties using AI platforms on behalf of the University, and frames responsible AI use around information security, data privacy, copyright, and academic integrity.
暂无可比较的新旧文字。
暂无可比较的新旧文字。
暂无可比较的新旧文字。
暂无可比较的新旧文字。
暂无可比较的新旧文字。
暂无可比较的新旧文字。