版本差异
University of Nottingham
针对...的统一追踪器差异 public-release-20260523-001。未发布完整的源页面文本；仅显示简短的原始语言证据片段以供引用参考。
统一差异
基于公开版本快照生成的版本间跟踪器变更。
大学 of Nottingham public-release-20260523-001 差异
初始跟踪发布。
+20-0
11 # University of Nottingham AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+academic_integrity: For assessments where AI use is essential or optional, University of Nottingham guidance says acknowledgement expectations should come from module or assessment information and that students should keep records or chat logs of AI interactions.
5+Evidence (en-GB, be7378941be1): Where use of AI in your assessed work is marked as essential or optional, information on how to acknowledge your use of AI should be included in your module handbook or assessment brief. Whenever you are interacting with generative AI, it is good practice to keep a full record or chat log of these interactions.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T02:36:28.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: The University of Nottingham Quality Manual includes unpermitted generative-AI-generated or AI-improved assessment work within false authorship.
10+Evidence (en-GB, f832520e83b4): False Authorship includes the submission of work that is generated and/or improved by software that is not permitted for that assessment. This may include the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) software to produce text, images or data or other work (e.g., Copilot, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, BARD, Wordtune, Quillbot, DALL-E, chatbots and similar).
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T02:36:28.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+ai_tool_treatment: University of Nottingham student guidance says AI use for assessed work is assessment-specific: module or assessment information should say whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited, and students should not assume permission.
15+Evidence (en-GB, d67a490aa5e3): Your module tutor and/or assessment documents should specify which uses of AI are essential, optional, and/or prohibited for each assessed piece of work. The information should also tell you how to acknowledge and provide evidence of any AI use. If you can't find this information, check with your module convenor. Do not make any assumptions about uses of AI in your assessments.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T02:36:28.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+privacy: For study support outside assessments, University of Nottingham guidance recommends Microsoft Copilot with a Nottingham login and says logged-in Copilot will not record prompts, inputs, or uploads as training data.
20+Evidence (en-GB, 57d04e1a4bef): When using generative AI to support your studies outside of your assessments, the university provides access to and recommends use of Microsoft Copilot, with your University of Nottingham login. When you are logged in, Copilot will not record your prompts, inputs, and uploads as training data. This is the best way to maintain privacy and data protection whilst using generative AI.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T02:36:28.000Z
1022 ## Source attribution added
1123 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
24+Source https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/qualitymanual/assessment-awards-and-deg-classification/pol-academic-misconduct.aspx snapshot f832520e83b4b11988bf981ee0108fa6415e0c533cd67fe36666758627b99d8d
25+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T02:36:28.000Z
1226 ## Source attribution added
1327 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
28+Source https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/studyingeffectively/ai/ai-assessment.aspx snapshot be7378941be1fd5eb9892b4ebc0576c0d7e9dee4c23344ccc050c521e9dda19a
29+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T02:36:28.000Z
1430 ## Source attribution added
1531 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
32+Source https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/studyingeffectively/ai/ai-support.aspx snapshot 57d04e1a4bef10cadbef375f7d1057bc3f05a6277b34590edd42ef57258e5ba3
33+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T02:36:28.000Z
1634 ## Source attribution added
1735 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
36+Source https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/studyingeffectively/ai/ai.aspx snapshot d67a490aa5e3a14714c61d8b0a587397d98561ae3b7b7f53a918038b14968c1a
37+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-14T02:36:28.000Z
如何阅读此差异
追踪器发布元数据，而非大学发布时间点的直接证明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更意味着同一 URL 产生了不同的哈希值；这可能是政策文本、布局、导航或元数据的变化。
边界
仅限追踪器元数据
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.