Change log

Keio University

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Keio University currently has 10 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

10 claim records

other

Keio's guideline says generative AI is a tool to support learning, research, and work, and that users are solely responsible for final judgment and use of AI-generated content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesja

privacy

Keio's guideline warns that Google AI Studio is outside Keio's official covered services and asks users to refrain from entering important information such as personal or confidential data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesja

security_review

Keio's guideline classifies Gemini and NotebookLM under Keio's contract as corporately contracted AI services available through Keio.jp accounts in a trial standard-feature implementation as of July 2025.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesja

research

Keio's generative AI usage guideline warns that using AI-generated information as-is may unintentionally constitute research misconduct and says researchers remain responsible for transparency, reproducibility, and research outcomes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesja

teaching

Keio's generative AI usage guideline strongly recommends verifying AI-generated information against primary sources because generative AI may produce hallucinated information.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesja

privacy

Keio's generative AI usage guideline tells users not to input personal or sensitive information through prompts or file attachments into AI services outside Keio's corporate contracts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesja

source_status

Keio's generative AI usage guideline states that it applies to all Keio students, graduate students, faculty, and staff, including integrated education schools and university hospitals regardless of employment status.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesja

academic_integrity

Keio University says generative AI is not permitted for class assignments or exams when students are required to work independently.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesja

academic_integrity

Keio University says students need to clearly indicate when reports or similar assignments are created using generative AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesja

ai_tool_treatment

Keio University tells students to use generative AI appropriately under the relevant faculty or instructor policy when a course, faculty, graduate school, or instructor encourages or permits its use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesja

Source snapshots

3 source attributions