University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

变更日志

Justus-Liebig-University Giessen

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

审核: 智能体已审核最后检查时间2026年7月19日最后更改时间2026年7月19日声明5来源4最新发布public-release-20260718-008版本记录1
大学页面公开 JSON月度报告大学索引

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Justus-Liebig-University Giessen currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年7月19日. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Justus-Liebig-University Giessen。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的1证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源1已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Justus-Liebig-University Giessen combined release 差异

将 public-release-20260717-001 与 public-release-20260718-008 进行比较。

+5-0
11 # Justus-Liebig-University Giessen AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: kiChat is listed for Justus-Liebig-University Giessen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
5+Evidence (en, f2b24468094b): The kiChat offers simple, privacy-compliant and free access to powerful language models from various providers.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-19T03:03:00.000Z
47 ## Source attribution added
58 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
9+Source https://www.uni-giessen.de/en/faculties/svc/it/it-service-centre/services/ai snapshot f2b24468094b12dda1928b2cd53131fc2bd58ea9ae81c6835e2960b6f6948e6b
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-19T03:03:00.000Z

版本历史

1 公开发布差异

public-release-20260718-008

与 public-release-20260717-001 相比。

政策文本0新提取的1源快照0源文本0
版本差异差异 JSON

Justus-Liebig-University Giessen public-release-20260718-008 差异

将 public-release-20260717-001 与 public-release-20260718-008 进行比较。

+5-0
11 # Justus-Liebig-University Giessen AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: kiChat is listed for Justus-Liebig-University Giessen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
5+Evidence (en, f2b24468094b): The kiChat offers simple, privacy-compliant and free access to powerful language models from various providers.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-19T03:03:00.000Z
47 ## Source attribution added
58 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
9+Source https://www.uni-giessen.de/en/faculties/svc/it/it-service-centre/services/ai snapshot f2b24468094b12dda1928b2cd53131fc2bd58ea9ae81c6835e2960b6f6948e6b
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-19T03:03:00.000Z

声明变更

5 声明 条记录

ai_tool_treatment

kiChat is listed for Justus-Liebig-University Giessen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%证据1语言en

privacy

JLU HRZ guidance says external AI services such as chatgpt.com outside JLU kiChat require review or approval for personal, non-public, or confidential data, and states that chatgpt.com must not be used for personal or non-public information.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言de

ai_tool_treatment

JLU presents central AI offers for its members, including HRZ-provided JLU kiChat and API services described as secure and privacy-compliant AI solutions for research, teaching, and administration.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%证据1语言de

academic_integrity

JLU guidance states that if AI use is not allowed, or if AI is not addressed, using AI in the writing process and presenting external work as one's own can be treated as an attempted deception.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言de

teaching

JLU guidance says that when generative AI use is permitted in an exam task, the use, including prompting, is part of the assessed work and should be documented as good academic practice.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言de

源快照

4 source attributions