University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

变更日志

Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

审核: 智能体已审核最后检查时间2026年5月16日最后更改时间2026年5月16日声明4来源3版本记录0
大学页面公开 JSON月度报告大学索引

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月16日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+8-0
11 # Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: GIST's research misconduct reporting page lists reportable targets including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, improper authorship, duplicate publication, investigation obstruction, serious departures from accepted academic norms, and coercing or proposing misconduct.
3+Evidence (ko, 9d419160ee48): 연구부정행위 신고대상 ‘위조’, ‘변조’, ‘표절’, ‘부당한 논문저자 표시’, ‘부당한 중복게재’, ‘연구부정 행위에 대한 조사 방해 행위’, 각 학문 분야에서 통상적으로 용인되는 범위를 심각하게 벗어난 행위, 타인에게 부정행위를 행할 것을 제안·강요·협박하는 행위
4+privacy: For the NRF-scoped guidance relayed by GIST, the listed recommendations include not uploading evaluation materials to AI tools, indicating AI tool use, verifying reliability and validity, and caution about research-data leakage.
5+Evidence (ko, 2319b3383bad): ○ 권고 내용 - (비밀유지) AI 도구에 평가자료 업로드 금지 - (정보공개) AI 도구 사용 내역 표기 권장 ※ 사용 시 표기 방식(예시) 마련 - (검증책임) AI 도구 사용 시 자료의 신뢰성, 타당성 확보를 위한 검증 책임 명시 - (보안책임) AI 도구에 연구자료 업로드 시 정보 유출 주의, 유출 시 연구자 책임 명시
6+research: GIST's Research Office notice relays NRF guidance for NRF project applicants, performers, and evaluators to use generative AI tools ethically and responsibly in related work.
7+Evidence (ko, 2319b3383bad): 한국연구재단에서 재단 과제의 신청·수행 및 평가 업무에 참여하는 연구자가 생성형 인공지능(AI) 도구를 "윤리적이고 책임있게" 사용하도록 『생성형 인공지능(AI) 도구의 책임 있는 사용을 위한 권고사항』 (개정판)을 마련하여 붙임과 같이 배포하오니 관련 업무시 활용하여 주시기 바랍니다.
8+academic_integrity: GIST's undergraduate academic handbook lists academic and research-related disciplinary categories including exam-score manipulation or question leakage, cheating during exams, class disruption, academic warning, and research ethics violations.
9+Evidence (ko, afef7c5932e1): 2. 학업/연구 관련 가. 시험성적 조작 및 문제 유출 나. 시험 중 부정행위 다. 수업방해 라. 학사경고 마. 연구윤리 위반

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

4 声明 条记录

academic_integrity

GIST's undergraduate academic handbook lists academic and research-related disciplinary categories including exam-score manipulation or question leakage, cheating during exams, class disruption, academic warning, and research ethics violations.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度78%证据1语言ko

academic_integrity

GIST's research misconduct reporting page lists reportable targets including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, improper authorship, duplicate publication, investigation obstruction, serious departures from accepted academic norms, and coercing or proposing misconduct.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%证据1语言ko

privacy

For the NRF-scoped guidance relayed by GIST, the listed recommendations include not uploading evaluation materials to AI tools, indicating AI tool use, verifying reliability and validity, and caution about research-data leakage.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度84%证据1语言ko

research

GIST's Research Office notice relays NRF guidance for NRF project applicants, performers, and evaluators to use generative AI tools ethically and responsibly in related work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度82%证据1语言ko

源快照

3 source attributions