Change log

Columbia University

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Columbia University currently has 16 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

16 claim records

source_status

Columbia University has a university-wide Generative AI Policy from the Office of the Provost governing use by staff, faculty, students, and researchers, covering information security, data privacy, copyright, academic integrity, and bias.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Columbia Business School requires students to disclose to faculty their use of generative AI platforms and the manner of use in coursework.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Columbia University requires researchers to avoid uploading unpublished research data or confidential information into generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

Columbia's Center for Teaching and Learning maintains a central AI Guidelines hub linking to the Provost's policy, academic integrity resources, CUIT resources, and best practices for responsible AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

Columbia University Information Technology (CUIT) publishes university-wide best practices for responsible AI use applicable to faculty, students, researchers, and staff.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Columbia Law School prohibits generative AI use in exams, final papers, and for drafting any part of work submitted for credit, even if fully documented.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

CUIMC provides HIPAA-compliant versions of ChatGPT Education and Microsoft Copilot as approved AI chatbot tools; workforce members must use CUIMC-issued accounts for compliance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

CUIMC restricts sensitive data (PHI, RHI, PII) use with AI to HIPAA-compliant platforms only (ChatGPT Education, approved Microsoft Copilot, CHAT with compliant models); research use requires IRB approval.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Columbia Law School's default AI prohibition can be overridden by individual instructors who set more permissive policies in writing in their syllabus.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

Columbia Law School permits students to use generative AI for studying, brainstorming, and identifying typographical errors, but not for writing, editing, revising, or translating text.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Columbia Law School requires all generative AI use to comply with university data protection policy; confidential or personal information must not be shared with AI tools unless retention and training use is disabled.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

As of March 2026, Google Gemini, NotebookLM, and Anthropic Claude are not approved for use with sensitive data at CUIMC; they may only be used with non-sensitive, non-confidential data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

CUIMC requires a formal IT Risk Assessment review before deploying any locally installed AI models (LLM, NLP, ML) to evaluate security, privacy, and compliance risks.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Teachers College provides five example syllabus statements ranging from no AI use permitted to generally permitted with attribution, allowing instructors to choose their stance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Teachers College example syllabus statements require citations or disclosure detailing specific AI tools and models used when AI use is permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

All Teachers College example syllabus statements include provisions for students with disabilities who have AI-related accommodations through OASID.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

8 source attributions

Generative AI - Office of the Provost - Columbia University

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 9, 2026, 10:32 PM

Snapshot hash
6b67d5eac87a042937279463b6baf1eeeea610cd3947b8cac7b65a59ad792fdd