public-release-20260715-005
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
Columbia University public-release-20260715-005 差异
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
变更日志
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
Columbia University currently has 20 source-backed claim records and 9 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年7月19日. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 4 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Columbia University。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
1 公开发布差异
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
20 声明 条记录
NotebookLM is listed for Columbia University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
CHAT is listed for Columbia University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Google Gemini is listed for Columbia University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
ChatGPT Education is listed for Columbia University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Columbia University has a university-wide Generative AI Policy from the Office of the Provost governing use by staff, faculty, students, and researchers, covering information security, data privacy, copyright, academic integrity, and bias.
Columbia Business School requires students to disclose to faculty their use of generative AI platforms and the manner of use in coursework.
Columbia University requires researchers to avoid uploading unpublished research data or confidential information into generative AI tools.
Columbia's Center for Teaching and Learning maintains a central AI Guidelines hub linking to the Provost's policy, academic integrity resources, CUIT resources, and best practices for responsible AI use.
Columbia University Information Technology (CUIT) publishes university-wide best practices for responsible AI use applicable to faculty, students, researchers, and staff.
Columbia Law School prohibits generative AI use in exams, final papers, and for drafting any part of work submitted for credit, even if fully documented.
CUIMC provides HIPAA-compliant versions of ChatGPT Education and Microsoft Copilot as approved AI chatbot tools; workforce members must use CUIMC-issued accounts for compliance.
CUIMC restricts sensitive data (PHI, RHI, PII) use with AI to HIPAA-compliant platforms only (ChatGPT Education, approved Microsoft Copilot, CHAT with compliant models); research use requires IRB approval.
Columbia Law School's default AI prohibition can be overridden by individual instructors who set more permissive policies in writing in their syllabus.
Columbia Law School permits students to use generative AI for studying, brainstorming, and identifying typographical errors, but not for writing, editing, revising, or translating text.
Columbia Law School requires all generative AI use to comply with university data protection policy; confidential or personal information must not be shared with AI tools unless retention and training use is disabled.
As of March 2026, Google Gemini, NotebookLM, and Anthropic Claude are not approved for use with sensitive data at CUIMC; they may only be used with non-sensitive, non-confidential data.
CUIMC requires a formal IT Risk Assessment review before deploying any locally installed AI models (LLM, NLP, ML) to evaluate security, privacy, and compliance risks.
Teachers College provides five example syllabus statements ranging from no AI use permitted to generally permitted with attribution, allowing instructors to choose their stance.
Teachers College example syllabus statements require citations or disclosure detailing specific AI tools and models used when AI use is permitted.
All Teachers College example syllabus statements include provisions for students with disabilities who have AI-related accommodations through OASID.
9 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月9日 22:32
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月15日 21:02
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月9日 22:32
official_policy_page Tracker checked at 2026年5月9日 22:32
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月9日 22:32
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月9日 22:32
official_policy_page Tracker checked at 2026年5月9日 22:32
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月9日 22:32
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月9日 22:32