public-release-20260719-011
与 public-release-20260718-009 相比。
Carleton University public-release-20260719-011 差异
将 public-release-20260718-009 与 public-release-20260719-011 进行比较。
变更日志
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
Carleton University currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年7月19日. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 4 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Carleton University。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
将 public-release-20260718-009 与 public-release-20260719-011 进行比较。
1 公开发布差异
与 public-release-20260718-009 相比。
将 public-release-20260718-009 与 public-release-20260719-011 进行比较。
8 声明 条记录
Web of Science Research Assistant is listed for Carleton University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Scopus AI is listed for Carleton University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for Carleton University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for Carleton University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Carleton identifies Microsoft Copilot as its only approved GenAI platform because it offers Enterprise Data Protection and has completed the university's Data Protection Risk Assessment process.
Carleton guidance says using AI tools to generate assignment content and presenting it as one's own work, or copying or paraphrasing AI-produced content without proper citations and instructor consent, is considered a violation of academic integrity.
Carleton instructor guidance says confidential, sensitive, or institutional data should use only Carleton-approved AI tools, and discourages adopting third-party tools that have not been cleared for privacy and security by the university.
Carleton instructor guidance recommends syllabus and assignment instructions that specify how AI tools should be used, including clear parameters for how a tool may and may not be used.
6 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月20日 01:43
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月20日 01:42
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月19日 12:38
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月20日 01:44
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月19日 12:36
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月20日 01:45