procurement
Carleton identifies Microsoft Copilot as its only approved GenAI platform because it offers Enterprise Data Protection and has completed the university's Data Protection Risk Assessment process.
Change log
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Carleton University currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Carleton University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
0 public release diffs
4 claim records
Carleton identifies Microsoft Copilot as its only approved GenAI platform because it offers Enterprise Data Protection and has completed the university's Data Protection Risk Assessment process.
Carleton guidance says using AI tools to generate assignment content and presenting it as one's own work, or copying or paraphrasing AI-produced content without proper citations and instructor consent, is considered a violation of academic integrity.
Carleton instructor guidance says confidential, sensitive, or institutional data should use only Carleton-approved AI tools, and discourages adopting third-party tools that have not been cleared for privacy and security by the university.
Carleton instructor guidance recommends syllabus and assignment instructions that specify how AI tools should be used, including clear parameters for how a tool may and may not be used.
4 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:43 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:42 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:44 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:45 AM