Change log

Carleton University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Carleton University currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Carleton University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Carleton University combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+8-0
11 # Carleton University AI policy record
2+procurement: Carleton identifies Microsoft Copilot as its only approved GenAI platform because it offers Enterprise Data Protection and has completed the university's Data Protection Risk Assessment process.
3+Evidence (en, d8fa3f41b114): Microsoft Copilot is Carleton’s only approved GenAI platform because it offers Enterprise Data Protection and has successfully completed the university’s Data Protection Risk Assessment (DPRA) process.
4+academic_integrity: Carleton guidance says using AI tools to generate assignment content and presenting it as one's own work, or copying or paraphrasing AI-produced content without proper citations and instructor consent, is considered a violation of academic integrity.
5+Evidence (en, 0077d63fdf91): Using AI tools to generate content for assignments and presenting it as one’s own original work, as well as copying or paraphrasing the content produced by AI tools without proper citations and the instructor’s consent, are both considered to be in violation of academic integrity.
6+privacy: Carleton instructor guidance says confidential, sensitive, or institutional data should use only Carleton-approved AI tools, and discourages adopting third-party tools that have not been cleared for privacy and security by the university.
7+Evidence (en, 8479b703b0df): Use only Carleton-approved AI tools for confidential, sensitive or institutional data in line with the Data Protection and Risk Management Policy and the AI Framework for Carleton University.
8+teaching: Carleton instructor guidance recommends syllabus and assignment instructions that specify how AI tools should be used, including clear parameters for how a tool may and may not be used.
9+Evidence (en, 8479b703b0df): Include detailed instructions for individual tasks that provide clear parameters for how the tool may and may not be used.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

4 claim records

procurement

Carleton identifies Microsoft Copilot as its only approved GenAI platform because it offers Enterprise Data Protection and has completed the university's Data Protection Risk Assessment process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Carleton guidance says using AI tools to generate assignment content and presenting it as one's own work, or copying or paraphrasing AI-produced content without proper citations and instructor consent, is considered a violation of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Carleton instructor guidance says confidential, sensitive, or institutional data should use only Carleton-approved AI tools, and discourages adopting third-party tools that have not been cleared for privacy and security by the university.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Carleton instructor guidance recommends syllabus and assignment instructions that specify how AI tools should be used, including clear parameters for how a tool may and may not be used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions

AI Data Protection - Artificial Intelligence

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:42 AM

Snapshot hash
d8fa3f41b114af71366774841ef947dd35d75447989b66e401f11b2b22d447ab

Policies and Guidelines - Artificial Intelligence

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 20, 2026, 1:45 AM

Snapshot hash
378a42e40584874ab0a44d5d9259239c1a71bd23b171310230de5040d4d8d372