Change log

Arizona State University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Claims9Sources7Release records0

University page Public JSON Monthly report University index

Arizona State University currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 7 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Arizona State University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

11 # Arizona State University AI policy record
2+security_review: ASU's AI tools page says tools not listed on that page are not approved for enterprise use.
3+Evidence (en, 2380813189a7): Tools not listed on this page are not approved for enterprise use.
4+privacy: ASU Digital Trust guidelines instruct users not to share information that is internal, sensitive, or highly sensitive to university policies and rules.
5+Evidence (en, 15c64e27c233): Do not share information that is internal, sensitive or highly sensitive to university policies and rules.
6+privacy: ASU Research Compliance guidance says not to place any US export-controlled data into any generative AI tools.
7+Evidence (en, af1b63d6a1bc): Do not place any US export-controlled data into any generative AI tools.
8+ai_tool_treatment: ASU Provost guidance says data for the described generative-AI teaching support is securely maintained within ASU infrastructure, supporting privacy and transparency.
9+Evidence (en, 8daa7840080c): Data is securely maintained within the ASU infrastructure, ensuring both privacy and transparency.
10+research: ASU Research Compliance guidance says to use only tools that have been approved for use at ASU.
11+Evidence (en, af1b63d6a1bc): Use only tools that have been approved for use at ASU.
12+ai_tool_treatment: ASU Provost FAQs direct students to confer with their instructor about class policy before using AI tools in coursework.
13+Evidence (en, 4458c61a69d6): Before using AI tools in your coursework, confer with your instructor about their class policy for using AI tools.
14+academic_integrity: ASU Library guidance says acknowledging the use of generative AI tools is a key part of maintaining academic integrity.
15+Evidence (en, ea80ff904bda): Acknowledging the use of generative AI tools is a key part of maintaining academic integrity.
16+academic_integrity: ASU Digital Trust guidelines tell users to be honest about their use of generative AI tools in preparing materials.
17+Evidence (en, 15c64e27c233): Be honest about your use of generative AI tools in preparing the materials.
18+teaching: The ASU School of Life Sciences teaching toolkit says instructors should clearly communicate expectations for student use of generative AI in the syllabus.
19+Evidence (en, 0d3043c739a0): It is essential that instructors clearly communicate expectations for student use of generative AI in the syllabus.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

9 claim records

teaching

The ASU School of Life Sciences teaching toolkit says instructors should clearly communicate expectations for student use of generative AI in the syllabus.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

ASU Library guidance says acknowledging the use of generative AI tools is a key part of maintaining academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

ASU Research Compliance guidance says not to place any US export-controlled data into any generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

research

ASU Research Compliance guidance says to use only tools that have been approved for use at ASU.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

ASU Digital Trust guidelines tell users to be honest about their use of generative AI tools in preparing materials.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

ASU Digital Trust guidelines instruct users not to share information that is internal, sensitive, or highly sensitive to university policies and rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

ASU's AI tools page says tools not listed on that page are not approved for enterprise use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

ASU Provost FAQs direct students to confer with their instructor about class policy before using AI tools in coursework.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

ASU Provost guidance says data for the described generative-AI teaching support is securely maintained within ASU infrastructure, supporting privacy and transparency.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen