research
American University research guidance says researchers should be transparent about AI use, verify AI-generated content against trusted sources, protect data privacy, and not list AI systems as co-authors.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
American University
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
American University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for American University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
American University combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # American University AI policy record
2+privacy: American University guidance says not to enter sensitive, Confidential, or Official Use data into an AI platform unless approved by a university official, and not to upload, input, or analyze university data in an AI tool that OIT has not approved.
3+Evidence (en, 395cbd91591c): Do not enter any sensitive data, or Confidential or Official Use data (as defined in the university Data Classification Policy) in an AI platform, unless approved by a university official.
4+academic_integrity: American University guidance says students are responsible for course AI policies in syllabi, and misuse of AI or use without permission or disclosure may constitute an Academic Integrity Code violation.
5+Evidence (en, 395cbd91591c): Misuse of AI or use of AI without permission or disclosure may constitute a violation of the Academic Integrity Code.
6+source_status: American University publishes responsible-use guidance for AI tools that applies general principles of transparency, accountability, human oversight, data protection, privacy, teaching, research, staff, and student use.
7+Evidence (en, 395cbd91591c): The following guidance outlines acceptable practices for utilizing AI tools while safeguarding institutional, personal, and proprietary information.
8+research: American University research guidance says researchers should be transparent about AI use, verify AI-generated content against trusted sources, protect data privacy, and not list AI systems as co-authors.
9+Evidence (en, 395cbd91591c): Be transparent about the use of AI in your research. Clearly track and, where appropriate, disclose when, how, and which AI tools (including versions) are used, whether for data analysis, content generation, or writing assistance.
10+teaching: American University guidance places AI-use expectations at the course level: syllabi should state whether AI use is prohibited or permitted, and the CFE page says AU does not currently regulate faculty and student use of generative AI through a single university-wide rule.
11+Evidence (en, 395cbd91591c): Course syllabi should clearly state policies and expectations about the use of AI, whether prohibited or permitted.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
5 claim records
academic_integrity
American University guidance says students are responsible for course AI policies in syllabi, and misuse of AI or use without permission or disclosure may constitute an Academic Integrity Code violation.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
American University guidance places AI-use expectations at the course level: syllabi should state whether AI use is prohibited or permitted, and the CFE page says AU does not currently regulate faculty and student use of generative AI through a single university-wide rule.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
American University guidance says not to enter sensitive, Confidential, or Official Use data into an AI platform unless approved by a university official, and not to upload, input, or analyze university data in an AI tool that OIT has not approved.
Review: Agent reviewed
source_status
American University publishes responsible-use guidance for AI tools that applies general principles of transparency, accountability, human oversight, data protection, privacy, teaching, research, staff, and student use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
3 source attributions
AI & Academic Integrity: OAI's Fall Guidance 2024
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 3:23 AM
Artificial Intelligence
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 3:22 AM
University Guidance on the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 3:20 AM