紀錄修訂

Yonsei University

此為本網站已審查紀錄的更新,並不代表大學已變更其政策。

追蹤器的發布時間並非大學政策的生效日期。

修訂版本: qs46-50-v6-r1-20261023 ·

前次記錄的修訂版本: public-release-20260924-002

此紀錄更新的意義

結構化紀錄概覽

涉及記錄:12 (3 已更正/已調整 · 已新增 8 項 · 1 項暫留)

學術誠信 · 教學 · 另有 8 個主題

此修訂版本尚無經獨立審查的摘要可供使用。

這是一份歷史記錄摘要,並非當前許可或新大學規則的確認。

課程作業 · 涉及記錄:1 (已新增 1 項)

新增紀錄

已新增

The2025 instructor guideline assigns the course instructor the choice of prohibition, limited uses or broader uses, announced in syllabus and class. Example syllabus texts are options, not universal student permission.

考試 · 涉及記錄:1 (已新增 1 項)

新增紀錄

已新增

The2025 teacher guideline generally prohibits GenAI in supervised exams and limits electronic devices. In unproctored/open assessments, any permitted uses must be decided and announced beforehand. Preserve the “in principle” qualification and actual exam instructions.

披露 · 涉及記錄:1 (已新增 1 項)

新增紀錄

已新增

Where AI use is permitted, the instructor selects and announces one or more disclosure/log methods. Prompt fields, versions and upload examples are selected course methods, not a universal checklist.

資料安全 · 涉及記錄:1 (已新增 1 項)

新增紀錄

已新增

The2025 guidance warns against inputting personal/confidential/unpublished research or patent information into external cloud AI. Teachers should not upload entire student assessment texts for AI grading/analysis. No retention duration or approved institutional service is established.

研究與發表 · 涉及記錄:1 (已新增 1 項)

新增紀錄

已新增

The2025 researcher guideline does not recognise AI as author. Humans retain core design/analysis/conclusions and responsibility; disclose tool/version/developer/purpose, verify outputs and follow journal requirements. Core original outputs may not be generated by AI under the stated restriction.

學術誠信 · 涉及記錄:5 (2 已更正/已調整 · 已新增 3 項)

網站更正

網站結論文字變更
舊文本

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance says students using generative AI in academic work must provide clear and accurate citations.

新文字

Yonsei’s May 2024 guideline asks students to clearly cite generative AI use; the August 2025 instructor guideline requires instructors to specify permissible course uses and choose and announce appropriate disclosure or prompt-record submission methods.

網站更正

網站結論文字變更
舊文本

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance tells students that generative AI may be permitted or restricted depending on the course and that students should consult the syllabus and course policies.

新文字

Yonsei students should follow the instructor’s announced syllabus/course AI-use rules; the August 2025 instructor guideline also addresses permitted and prohibited exam contexts and disclosure when use is allowed.

新增紀錄

已新增

AI detector results are supplementary and should not alone determine grades or sanctions; consider the student’s explanation and instructor review. General grading dishonesty rules do not make every AI use cheating.

新增紀錄

已新增

The2026 academic rules require scholarly ethics and allow discipline under their conditions. The undergraduate grading page says dishonesty/cheating invalidates obtained grades and gives the course F. No universal AI-specific penalty follows without the applicable course rule and finding.

新增紀錄

已新增

The research-integrity committee process is for research participants, not ordinary course appeals. Preliminary investigation starts within30 days of report and finishes within30 of start; main investigation starts within30 after approval and finishes within120, extendable with approval. Objection is within30 days of determination notice and processed within60 of receipt. Day types are unspecified.

教學 · 涉及記錄:1 (1 項暫留)

已保留/已移出目前結論

保留的歷史文字;這並不代表大學廢止了該規定。

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance says generative AI use in courses should be based on clear agreement between instructors and learners, with instructors giving minimum guidance when use is permitted.

已保留/已移出目前結論
隱私 · 涉及記錄:1 (1 已更正/已調整)

網站更正

網站結論文字變更
舊文本

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance warns users not to enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable information into generative AI tools.

新文字

Yonsei’s 2024 guideline discourages entering confidential, sensitive or personal data into generative AI; the August 2025 researcher guideline specifically warns against entering personal, patent, confidential and unpublished research data into external cloud-based AI services.

官方來源 · 來源核對