Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Zhengzhou, China (Mainland)
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Zhengzhou University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Zhengzhou University has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Zhengzhou University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Zhengzhou University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Zhengzhou University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Zhengzhou University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Zhengzhou University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
Normalized value: AI literacy standards announced for undergraduate students and teachers
Original evidence
Evidence 1本科生标准围绕“意识与认知、知识与技能、应用与创新、伦理与安全”四大维度,设立四级认证体系;教师标准聚焦“意识与认知、教学设计与实施、评估与优化、伦理与责任”四大模块,建立三级发展体系。
Localized display only
The undergraduate standard covers awareness/cognition, knowledge/skills, application/innovation, and ethics/safety; the teacher standard covers awareness/cognition, teaching design/implementation, evaluation/optimization, and ethics/responsibility.
Research
Normalized value: AI use in research misconduct risk is within academic ethics committee duties
Original evidence
Evidence 1学术道德委员会职责:...(四)分析研究学校在学术道德方面存在的问题并提出建议,研判人工智能技术在科研活动应用中可能存在的失信行为;
Localized display only
The Academic Ethics Committee's duties include analyzing academic-ethics problems and studying/judging possible dishonest conduct from AI technology use in research activities.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: AI literacy implementation support system
Original evidence
Evidence 1为保障标准落地,学校将构建课程教学、学习资源、实践平台、校园文化、激励保障“五位一体”支撑体系,包括开设人工智能通识必修课、建设“AI+专业”课程群、开放校级AI实验平台、举办AI文化节与创新大赛、建立与教学评价及职称评审适度挂钩的激励机制等。
Localized display only
For implementation, the university says it will build a five-part support system including a required AI general course, AI plus major course clusters, a university AI experiment platform, AI cultural activities and competitions, and incentive mechanisms.
0 machine or needs-review claim
2 source attribution
zzu.edu.cn
www7.zzu.edu.cn