Policy presence
York University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Toronto, Canada
York University is listed as QS 2026 rank 333. York University has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
v1 public contract
York University is listed as QS 2026 rank 333. York University has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists York University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/york-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
York University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
York University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
York University has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
York University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
York University has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
York University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
York University has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
York University has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
York University has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
York University has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Normalized value: no_york_data_in_public_ai_platforms
Original evidence
Evidence 1York University data must not be entered into public AI platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or similar services. This includes prompts, documents, or any content containing confidential, proprietary, or sensitive University information.
Privacy
Normalized value: approved_meeting_assistants_and_participant_consent
Original evidence
Evidence 1Only approved AI Meeting Assistants can be leveraged for internal York University virtual meetings. Meeting controls should be used to block all unauthorized bots. All participants of the meeting must be both notified and consent to the use of the AI Assistant.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: students_follow_instructor_ai_expectations_and_acknowledge_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students must follow instructor expectations for AI use and acknowledge their use of AI tools. If unsure, they are expected to seek clarification (section 6.2c)
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: sanctioned_ai_tools_only_and_zoom_ai_approved
Original evidence
Evidence 1Only use AI tools (featured below) that have been sanctioned by York and approved for secure use. Zoom AI Companion is an intelligent assistant built into the Zoom platform ... approved for use with York University content.
Security Review
Normalized value: administrative_genai_management_approval
Original evidence
Evidence 1Use - York supports staff using GenAI appropriately in University administrative or operational activities, subject to management approval. Assessment - Use of GenAI in University administrative or operational activities should be discussed with the supervisor and is subject to management approval
Teaching
Normalized value: genai_detection_tools_not_currently_recommended
Original evidence
Evidence 1York does not currently recommend the use of any GenAI detection tools. These technologies can be easily circumvented ... it is not recommended to upload any student work to an external GenAI or detector.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
5 source attribution
yorku.ca
yorku.ca
yorku.ca
yorku.ca
yorku.ca
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.