Policy presence
University of Texas at Dallas has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Richardson, United States
University of Texas at Dallas has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
University of Texas at Dallas has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Texas at Dallas has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Texas at Dallas has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
University of Texas at Dallas has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Texas at Dallas has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Texas at Dallas has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Texas at Dallas has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
University of Texas at Dallas has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
University of Texas at Dallas has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: faculty_discretion_permit_prohibit_or_partial_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Faculty have the freedom and responsibility to determine how generative AI can be used in academic work under faculty supervision.
Localized display only
Faculty have the freedom and responsibility to determine how generative AI can be used in academic work under faculty supervision.
Teaching
Normalized value: faculty_must_communicate_ai_use_before_semester_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1Faculty must explain and communicate appropriate generative AI use to the student before academic work begins for a given semester.
Localized display only
Faculty must explain and communicate appropriate generative AI use to the student before academic work begins for a given semester.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: document_attribute_and_verify_permitted_ai_output
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students should document and attribute the use of generative AI as appropriate to the academic style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.) or a professional style specified by the faculty member. Students must follow written guidelines from faculty on citation styles. Students must validate or verify the output from generative AI.
Localized display only
Students should document and attribute permitted generative AI use, follow written citation-style guidance, and validate or verify generative AI output.
Privacy
Normalized value: no_confidential_ferpa_or_hipaa_data_in_public_genai
Original evidence
Evidence 1You should not enter data classified as confidential into publicly-available Generative AI tools, following the University’s Information Security Policy. Information shared with Generative AI tools using default settings is not private and could expose proprietary or sensitive information to unauthorized parties. No FERPA or HIPAA information may be used in Generative AI tools.
Localized display only
OIT guidance says confidential data should not be entered into publicly available generative AI tools and that FERPA or HIPAA information may not be used in generative AI tools.
Security Review
Normalized value: official_duties_use_utdallas_provided_ai_tools_first
Original evidence
Evidence 1When performing official UT Dallas duties, it is recommended that faculty and staff use AI tools and AI software-as-a-service (Saas) websites provided by UT Dallas, rather than obtaining personal access to public or vended AI platforms because these are not approved and have not yet been evaluated for security.
Localized display only
For official duties, faculty and staff are recommended to use UT Dallas-provided AI tools before personal public or vended AI platforms that have not been approved or security-evaluated.
Source Status
Normalized value: oit_genai_tools_page_lists_available_ai_resources
Original evidence
Evidence 1UT Dallas AI Tools. Explore tools, training, and conversations that help bring GenAI to work across UT Dallas. CometAI is UT Dallas’s secure generative AI platform designed to support faculty and staff in research, teaching, and project management.
Localized display only
The OIT GenAI page lists UT Dallas AI tools and describes CometAI as a secure generative AI platform for faculty and staff.
0 machine or needs-review claim
5 source attribution
infosecurity.utdallas.edu
oit.utdallas.edu
genai.utdallas.edu
oit.utdallas.edu
policy.utdallas.edu