Policy presence
University of Texas at Dallas has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Richardson, United States
University of Texas at Dallas
University of Texas at Dallas has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 5 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 6 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.
University of Texas at Dallas AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of Texas at Dallas has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 5 official source attributions, including 6 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: University of Texas at Dallas is listed as QS 2026 rank =597.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Texas at Dallas as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-texas-at-dallas.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Texas at Dallas has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Texas at Dallas has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Texas at Dallas has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
University of Texas at Dallas has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Texas at Dallas has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Texas at Dallas has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Texas at Dallas has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
University of Texas at Dallas has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
University of Texas at Dallas has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
UT Dallas policy says faculty have discretion to permit, prohibit, or partially allow generative AI use in academic work under faculty supervision.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faculty_discretion_permit_prohibit_or_partial_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Faculty have the freedom and responsibility to determine how generative AI can be used in academic work under faculty supervision.
Localized display only
Faculty have the freedom and responsibility to determine how generative AI can be used in academic work under faculty supervision.
Teaching
UT Dallas policy says faculty must explain and communicate appropriate generative AI use before academic work begins for a given semester, and should include detailed statements in assignment descriptions and syllabi.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faculty_must_communicate_ai_use_before_semester_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1Faculty must explain and communicate appropriate generative AI use to the student before academic work begins for a given semester.
Localized display only
Faculty must explain and communicate appropriate generative AI use to the student before academic work begins for a given semester.
Academic Integrity
When generative AI use is permitted, UT Dallas policy says students should document and attribute generative AI use as appropriate and must validate or verify generative AI output.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: document_attribute_and_verify_permitted_ai_output
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students should document and attribute the use of generative AI as appropriate to the academic style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.) or a professional style specified by the faculty member. Students must follow written guidelines from faculty on citation styles. Students must validate or verify the output from generative AI.
Localized display only
Students should document and attribute permitted generative AI use, follow written citation-style guidance, and validate or verify generative AI output.
Privacy
UT Dallas OIT guidance says users should not enter confidential data into publicly available generative AI tools and that no FERPA or HIPAA information may be used in generative AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: no_confidential_ferpa_or_hipaa_data_in_public_genai
Original evidence
Evidence 1You should not enter data classified as confidential into publicly-available Generative AI tools, following the University’s Information Security Policy. Information shared with Generative AI tools using default settings is not private and could expose proprietary or sensitive information to unauthorized parties. No FERPA or HIPAA information may be used in Generative AI tools.
Localized display only
OIT guidance says confidential data should not be entered into publicly available generative AI tools and that FERPA or HIPAA information may not be used in generative AI tools.
Security Review
For official UT Dallas duties, Information Security guidance recommends faculty and staff use AI tools provided by UT Dallas rather than personal access to public or vended platforms that have not been approved or evaluated for security.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: official_duties_use_utdallas_provided_ai_tools_first
Original evidence
Evidence 1When performing official UT Dallas duties, it is recommended that faculty and staff use AI tools and AI software-as-a-service (Saas) websites provided by UT Dallas, rather than obtaining personal access to public or vended AI platforms because these are not approved and have not yet been evaluated for security.
Localized display only
For official duties, faculty and staff are recommended to use UT Dallas-provided AI tools before personal public or vended AI platforms that have not been approved or security-evaluated.
Source Status
UT Dallas OIT maintains a GenAI tools page that describes CometAI, M365 Copilot, Copilot Chat, Teams Premium, Azure OpenAI Services, AWS, and Amazon Bedrock as available AI resources or tool links.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: oit_genai_tools_page_lists_available_ai_resources
Original evidence
Evidence 1UT Dallas AI Tools. Explore tools, training, and conversations that help bring GenAI to work across UT Dallas. CometAI is UT Dallas’s secure generative AI platform designed to support faculty and staff in research, teaching, and project management.
Localized display only
The OIT GenAI page lists UT Dallas AI tools and describes CometAI as a secure generative AI platform for faculty and staff.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
5 source attribution
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage Guidelines
infosecurity.utdallas.edu
Gen AI - OIT | UT Dallas
oit.utdallas.edu
Generative AI at UT Dallas
genai.utdallas.edu
Initial Guidelines for Gen AI | OIT | UT Dallas
oit.utdallas.edu
UTDSP5017 Generative AI Use in Academic Work
policy.utdallas.edu
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.