Policy presence
University of Tasmania has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Hobart, Australia
University of Tasmania has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
University of Tasmania has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Tasmania has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Tasmania has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
University of Tasmania has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Tasmania has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Tasmania has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Tasmania has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: unapproved_inappropriate_unacknowledged_genai_may_breach_academic_integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Unapproved, inappropriate, or unacknowledged use of genAI may be considered as dishonest or unfair behaviour, and therefore a breach of academic integrity.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: assessment_specific_ai_permission
Original evidence
Evidence 1Your Unit Coordinator might encourage the use of AI as a resource for some assessments; others might not allow it. Be sure to check your assessment instructions carefully (e.g. within MyLO or the assessment instructions in your unit outline) or confirm with your Unit Coordinator if unsure.
Teaching
Normalized value: genai_support_learning_assessment_instructions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) tools should only be used to support your learning and assist with the completion of your assessments. The work that you submit must be yours only and must be prepared in accordance with the instructions for that assessment task.
0 machine or needs-review claim
1 source attribution
askus.utas.edu.au