Policy presence
University of Tasmania has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Hobart, Australia
University of Tasmania
University of Tasmania is listed as QS 2026 rank =314. University of Tasmania has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 1 official source attribution. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of Tasmania is listed as QS 2026 rank =314. University of Tasmania has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 1 official source attribution. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Tasmania as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-tasmania.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Tasmania has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of Tasmania has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Tasmania has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
University of Tasmania has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Tasmania has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Tasmania has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Tasmania has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
University of Tasmania guidance says unapproved, inappropriate, or unacknowledged use of generative AI may be considered dishonest or unfair behaviour and therefore a breach of academic integrity.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unapproved_inappropriate_unacknowledged_genai_may_breach_academic_integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Unapproved, inappropriate, or unacknowledged use of genAI may be considered as dishonest or unfair behaviour, and therefore a breach of academic integrity.
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Tasmania guidance says whether AI is encouraged or not allowed can vary by assessment, and students should check assessment instructions or confirm with the Unit Coordinator if unsure.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: assessment_specific_ai_permission
Original evidence
Evidence 1Your Unit Coordinator might encourage the use of AI as a resource for some assessments; others might not allow it. Be sure to check your assessment instructions carefully (e.g. within MyLO or the assessment instructions in your unit outline) or confirm with your Unit Coordinator if unsure.
Teaching
University of Tasmania guidance says generative AI tools should only be used to support learning and assist with assessment completion, while submitted work must be the student's own and follow the assessment task instructions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_support_learning_assessment_instructions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) tools should only be used to support your learning and assist with the completion of your assessments. The work that you submit must be yours only and must be prepared in accordance with the instructions for that assessment task.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
1 source attribution
Can I use generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) for my assessments?
askus.utas.edu.au
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.