Hobart, Australia

University of Tasmania

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage3 reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources1Source languageen-AUPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-tasmania.json

Policy profile

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

AI disclosure

University of Tasmania has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

University of Tasmania has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

University of Tasmania has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

University of Tasmania has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

University of Tasmania guidance says unapproved, inappropriate, or unacknowledged use of generative AI may be considered dishonest or unfair behaviour and therefore a breach of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: unapproved_inappropriate_unacknowledged_genai_may_breach_academic_integrity

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Unapproved, inappropriate, or unacknowledged use of genAI may be considered as dishonest or unfair behaviour, and therefore a breach of academic integrity.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Tasmania guidance says whether AI is encouraged or not allowed can vary by assessment, and students should check assessment instructions or confirm with the Unit Coordinator if unsure.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: assessment_specific_ai_permission

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Your Unit Coordinator might encourage the use of AI as a resource for some assessments; others might not allow it. Be sure to check your assessment instructions carefully (e.g. within MyLO or the assessment instructions in your unit outline) or confirm with your Unit Coordinator if unsure.

Teaching

University of Tasmania guidance says generative AI tools should only be used to support learning and assist with assessment completion, while submitted work must be the student's own and follow the assessment task instructions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: genai_support_learning_assessment_instructions

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) tools should only be used to support your learning and assist with the completion of your assessments. The work that you submit must be yours only and must be prepared in accordance with the instructions for that assessment task.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

1 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities