Policy presence
University of Surrey has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Guildford, United Kingdom
University of Surrey
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
University of Surrey has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
University of Surrey has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
University of Surrey has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Surrey has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Approved tools
University of Surrey has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Surrey has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Surrey has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Surrey has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
AI tools
University of Surrey
- Tool
- AI tools
- About
- Not specified
- Access
- Not specified
- Cost
- Not specified
- Availability
- Unknown
- Review
- Agent reviewed
- Sources
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
University of Surrey's GenAI procedure says personal, confidential, and commercially sensitive information, including intellectual property, must not be entered into GenAI tools unless those tools are approved by IT Services and meet security and compliance requirements.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: sensitive_data_requires_it_approved_genai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1To reduce the risk of data breaches and misuse, personal, confidential, and commercially sensitive information (including Intellectual Property) must NOT be entered into GenAI tools--internal or external--unless they are approved by IT Services and meet the organisation's security and compliance requirements.
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Surrey's GenAI procedure says all users must read and understand the procedure before using any form of GenAI during University work, and frames GenAI use as supporting teaching, research, and operations while protecting information and integrity.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: central_genai_procedure_requires_user_familiarity
Original evidence
Evidence 1This procedure sets out how GenAI tools may be used within the University to support teaching, research, and operations, while protecting information, complying with legal and regulatory requirements, and maintaining academic and professional integrity. All users must read and understand this procedure before engaging with any form of GenAI during University work.
Research
University of Surrey's CAQDAS guidance for qualitative data analysis says researchers intending to use Generative AI for any aspect of qualitative data analysis must be upfront with participants and seek their consent for using their data in that way.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: qda_genai_use_requires_participant_transparency_and_consent_guidance
Original evidence
Evidence 1If you intend to use Generative AI for any aspect of qualitative data analysis, you must be upfront about it with participants and seek their consent for you using their data in this way.
Academic Integrity
University of Surrey's MySurrey Help page advises students considering generative AI tools in their work to read the student GenAI guidance and to check assessment briefs or module leaders for the level of AI use permitted in a specific assessment.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_should_check_assessment_specific_ai_permissions
Original evidence
Evidence 1If you are thinking of using generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, etc., in your work, the University has produced guidelines for students on responsible use of generative AI (Gen AI). It is important to read and familiarise yourself with these guidelines. In addition, always check your Assessment Briefs or consult your Module Leaders about the levels of AI use permitted for any specific assessment.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
3 source attribution
Ethics of AI in QDA
surrey.ac.uk
Generative AI Procedure
surrey.ac.uk
Where can I find help and advice about using artificial intelligence responsibly in my work?
help.surrey.ac.uk