Policy presence
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Norwich, United Kingdom
University of East Anglia (UEA)
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
UEA's research and innovation policy says researchers are currently prohibited from entering personal, confidential, third-party, or UEA business-critical data into a generative AI tool without prior approval from information compliance and IT.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_sensitive_data_ai_input_requires_prior_approval
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University currently prohibits researchers to input any Personal (including Special Category Data), Confidential, Third Party, or UEA Business Critical Data / information / material into a Generative AI tool, without prior approval from the Information Compliance Team and the relevant IT Team.
Academic Integrity
UEA's plagiarism and collusion policy permits AI to help students understand material and expression, but says using AI to complete an assessment, or part of it, is plagiarism and may reach contract cheating.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_completion_of_assessment_plagiarism_or_contract_cheating
Original evidence
Evidence 1While you are permitted to use artificial intelligence software to help you understand material and how that can be expressed, you are not allowed to use that software to complete the assessment (or any part of it) for you. If you use artificial intelligence software to complete the work for you, that will be plagiarism.
Teaching
UEA's teaching and learning policy does not prohibit generative AI use, and says each School of Study should meet at least annually to discuss generative AI's impact on assessment design and set School-level expectations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: teaching_ai_permitted_with_discipline_specific_expectations
Original evidence
Evidence 1The policy does not prohibit the use of Generative AI for teaching and learning but aims to add clarity around appropriate use. Each School of Study should meet at least once per academic year to discuss the impact of generative AI on assessment design and set School-level expectations.
Research
UEA's research and innovation policy requires a self-assessment process when generative AI will be used, built, or developed in UEA research, subject to listed exceptions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_ai_self_assessment_required_subject_to_exceptions
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University requires the completion of a Self Assessment Form for research undertaken by UEA staff and students or involving UEA, where a Generative AI tool will be used, built or developed, noting the exceptions listed below.
Academic Integrity
For Norwich Medical School written assessments, UEA's FOI appendix says generative AI is not permitted in writing submissions unless a module leader explicitly permits it, while early ideation and later grammar or clarity support are allowed.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: medicine_written_assessment_ai_not_permitted_for_writing_except_module_permission
Original evidence
Evidence 1The use of generative artificial intelligence is not permitted in the writing of your submission, unless explicitly permitted by the module leader. This includes, but is not limited to, NOT using AI to generate or draft written content, rewrite or paraphrase existing material, summarise academic sources, or create citations or references.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
5 source attribution
FOI_26-036 Appendix A: Norwich Medical School Policy on the use of Artificial Intelligence in Written Assessments
assets.uea.ac.uk
FOI_26-036 Generative AI policies in Medicine programmes
uea.ac.uk
Generative AI Policy for Research and Innovation
assets.uea.ac.uk
Generative AI Policy for Teaching and Learning
assets.uea.ac.uk
University Policy on Plagiarism and Collusion 2025/26
assets.uea.ac.uk