Policy presence
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Norwich, United Kingdom
University of East Anglia (UEA)
University of East Anglia (UEA) is listed as QS 2026 rank =381. University of East Anglia (UEA) has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of East Anglia (UEA) is listed as QS 2026 rank =381. University of East Anglia (UEA) has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of East Anglia (UEA) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-east-anglia-uea.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of East Anglia (UEA) has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
UEA's research and innovation policy says researchers are currently prohibited from entering personal, confidential, third-party, or UEA business-critical data into a generative AI tool without prior approval from information compliance and IT.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_sensitive_data_ai_input_requires_prior_approval
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University currently prohibits researchers to input any Personal (including Special Category Data), Confidential, Third Party, or UEA Business Critical Data / information / material into a Generative AI tool, without prior approval from the Information Compliance Team and the relevant IT Team.
Academic Integrity
UEA's plagiarism and collusion policy permits AI to help students understand material and expression, but says using AI to complete an assessment, or part of it, is plagiarism and may reach contract cheating.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_completion_of_assessment_plagiarism_or_contract_cheating
Original evidence
Evidence 1While you are permitted to use artificial intelligence software to help you understand material and how that can be expressed, you are not allowed to use that software to complete the assessment (or any part of it) for you. If you use artificial intelligence software to complete the work for you, that will be plagiarism.
Teaching
UEA's teaching and learning policy does not prohibit generative AI use, and says each School of Study should meet at least annually to discuss generative AI's impact on assessment design and set School-level expectations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: teaching_ai_permitted_with_discipline_specific_expectations
Original evidence
Evidence 1The policy does not prohibit the use of Generative AI for teaching and learning but aims to add clarity around appropriate use. Each School of Study should meet at least once per academic year to discuss the impact of generative AI on assessment design and set School-level expectations.
Research
UEA's research and innovation policy requires a self-assessment process when generative AI will be used, built, or developed in UEA research, subject to listed exceptions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_ai_self_assessment_required_subject_to_exceptions
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University requires the completion of a Self Assessment Form for research undertaken by UEA staff and students or involving UEA, where a Generative AI tool will be used, built or developed, noting the exceptions listed below.
Academic Integrity
For Norwich Medical School written assessments, UEA's FOI appendix says generative AI is not permitted in writing submissions unless a module leader explicitly permits it, while early ideation and later grammar or clarity support are allowed.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: medicine_written_assessment_ai_not_permitted_for_writing_except_module_permission
Original evidence
Evidence 1The use of generative artificial intelligence is not permitted in the writing of your submission, unless explicitly permitted by the module leader. This includes, but is not limited to, NOT using AI to generate or draft written content, rewrite or paraphrase existing material, summarise academic sources, or create citations or references.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
5 source attribution
FOI_26-036 Appendix A: Norwich Medical School Policy on the use of Artificial Intelligence in Written Assessments
assets.uea.ac.uk
FOI_26-036 Generative AI policies in Medicine programmes
uea.ac.uk
Generative AI Policy for Research and Innovation
assets.uea.ac.uk
Generative AI Policy for Teaching and Learning
assets.uea.ac.uk
University Policy on Plagiarism and Collusion 2025/26
assets.uea.ac.uk
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.