Policy presence
University of Basel has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Basel, Switzerland
University of Basel has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
University of Basel has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Basel has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Basel has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Basel has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
University of Basel has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Basel has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Basel has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Basel has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Basel has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: ai_tools_must_be_cited_complete_attribution
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI tools must always be cited, just like other tools and sources. Student papers without complete attribution of sources and tools may be seen as attempted plagiarism or cheating.
Localized display only
The AI citation PDF says AI tools must be cited and incomplete attribution may be treated as attempted plagiarism or cheating.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: no_general_ai_ban_case_by_case_teaching_assessment
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University of Basel does not plan to introduce a general ban on AI-based tools. Professors and lecturers can decide on a case-by-case basis if they want to integrate AI-based tools into their teaching and/or into exams and assessments, or if they want to restrict their use.
Localized display only
Basel states there is no planned general AI-tool ban and leaves teaching, exam, and assessment integration or restriction to case-by-case lecturer decisions.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: ai_supporting_role_student_control_credit_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1Student assignments and examinations must always be the independent work of the students themselves. For this reason, AI-supported tools may only be used in a supporting role for any work that is submitted for credit. Students must retain a controlling role
Localized display only
The guidelines keep student work submitted for credit independent and limit AI tools to a supporting role, with students retaining control.
Privacy
Normalized value: licensed_content_chatgpt_ai_platform_third_party_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Third party use includes uploading licensed content or data to external platforms, specifically ChatGPT and other AI platforms, where storage and future use are controlled by third parties.
Localized display only
The University Library page treats uploading licensed content or data to ChatGPT and other AI platforms as third-party use controlled by outside parties.
Privacy
Normalized value: ai_teaching_data_protection_copyright_assessment
Original evidence
Evidence 1Compliance with data protection and copyright law (data is stored on US servers) Measures Assessing tools from the perspective of data protection and copyright law
Localized display only
The AI teaching matrix treats data protection and copyright compliance, including tool assessment, as part of AI-tool integration in teaching.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: ai_assessment_regulation_measures
Original evidence
Evidence 1Restricting the use of AI in exams and assessments ... Adapting tasks in exams and assessments (learning objectives level) ... Preventing access to tools (assessment security) Measures Exam-wifi / Safe Browser ... Setting up restrictions (preventive measures / scientific integrity) Measures Declaration of independent authorship
Localized display only
Basel lists assessment task adaptation, access prevention, and independent-authorship declarations as possible regulation measures for AI in exams and assessments.
Source Status
Normalized value: ai_initiative_services_training_risk_support
Original evidence
Evidence 1The initiative provides services that help answer open questions about AI, identify risks and minimise potential disadvantages. The latest research findings are being bundled and made visible, university teaching is being trained for the age of AI, and employees are being empowered to deal constructively with AI in the course of their work.
Localized display only
Basel describes its AI Initiative as a service, risk-identification, teaching-training, and employee-empowerment effort.
0 machine or needs-review claim
4 source attribution
ub.unibas.ch
unibas.ch
unibas.ch
unibas.ch