Policy presence
The American University in Cairo has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Cairo, Egypt
The American University in Cairo has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
The American University in Cairo has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
The American University in Cairo has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
The American University in Cairo has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
The American University in Cairo has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
The American University in Cairo has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
The American University in Cairo has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
The American University in Cairo has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: ai_use_acknowledgement_required_when_used
Original evidence
Evidence 1We urge all members of the AUC community to clearly acknowledge the use of AI tools when such tools have been used. If a community member claims AI material as his/her own, he/she is plagiarizing that source and will be in violation of AUC academic integrity policies.
Teaching
Normalized value: instructor_authorized_coursework_ai_use_with_written_context
Original evidence
Evidence 1For teaching and learning, a course instructor may, on occasion, authorize students to use AI tools in coursework. In such instances, the faculty member must alert the students, in writing, to the purpose of the work, and define the context in which AI may be used.
Teaching
Normalized value: faculty_should_clarify_course_ai_usage_and_discuss_with_students
Original evidence
Evidence 1Use CLT's Talking to Your Students About AI: Tips for Faculty. Emphasize the importance of original work for students' education and careers. Clarify acceptable and unacceptable AI usage in your course to avoid confusion. Discuss AI's role and impacts with your students during the first week and ahead of each major assessment.
Privacy
Normalized value: student_ai_use_privacy_and_reliability_caution
Original evidence
Evidence 1If you are permitted to use ChatGPT or similar AI, evaluate the content carefully and critically. Content produced may contain incorrect or biased and therefore unreliable information. These tools may also infringe on your privacy (e.g., collecting data about you and sharing it), so use them with caution.
0 machine or needs-review claim
3 source attribution
aucegypt.edu
aucegypt.edu
aucegypt.edu