Dresden, Germany

Technische Universität Dresden

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources2Source languagedePublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/technische-universitat-dresden.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

AI disclosure

Technische Universität Dresden has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

Technische Universität Dresden has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Technische Universität Dresden has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

Technische Universität Dresden has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence73%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records1

AI tools

Technische Universität Dresden

Tool
AI tools
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

TU Dresden's public AI-use guidance says unlabeled or unauthorized use of aids, including answers or results generated with AI-supported text-generation tools such as ChatGPT, constitutes deception under examination law.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: undisclosed_or_unauthorized_ai_use_deception

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Ungekennzeichnete bzw. unerlaubte (= nicht zugelassene) Verwendung von Hilfsmitteln, darunter zaehlen auch Antworten/Ergebnisse, die mit KI-gestuetzten Textgenerierungswerkzeuge wie ChatGPT generiert worden sind, stellen pruefungsrechtlich eine Taeuschung dar.

Localized display only

Unlabeled or unauthorized use of aids, including results generated with tools such as ChatGPT, constitutes deception under examination law.

Privacy

TU Dresden's public AI-use guidance tells users of external text-generating AI systems not to enter personal data and to use anonymous or anonymized data where possible.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: external_ai_no_personal_data

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Nutzen Sie KI-Systeme bitte mit anonymen bzw. anonymisierten Daten (z.B. technische, mathematische Daten). Es sollte davon abgesehen werden, personenbezogene Daten einzugeben.

Localized display only

Use AI systems with anonymous or anonymized data; refrain from entering personal data.

Academic Integrity

TU Dresden's public AI-use guidance says teachers and examiners can decide whether and to what extent AI-supported text-generation tools such as ChatGPT are used, including as permitted aids in examinations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: teacher_examiner_decision_permitted_aids

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Lehrende und Pruefende koennen entscheiden, ob und inwieweit KI-gestuetzte Textgenerierungswerkzeuge wie ChatGPT zum Einsatz kommen. Als zulaessiges Hilfsmittel in Pruefungen koennen Tools genutzt werden.

Localized display only

Teachers and examiners can decide whether and to what extent tools such as ChatGPT are used, including as permitted aids in examinations.

Ai Tool Treatment

TU Dresden's public AI-use guidance says the GWDG Chat AI service is available to German universities and that TU Dresden users access it with ZIH login via Academic Cloud.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: chat_ai_academic_cloud_zih_login

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Die Gesellschaft fuer wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Goettingen (GWDG) stellt kostenfrei den Large-Language-Model-Dienst (LLM) Chat AI fuer Hochschulen in Deutschland zur Verfuegung. Der Zugang zur Nutzung erfolgt per ZIH-Login ueber die Academic Cloud.

Localized display only

GWDG provides Chat AI for German universities; TU Dresden users access it with ZIH login via Academic Cloud.

Teaching

TU Dresden's Schreibzentrum provides a teaching-facing resource page on scientific writing with AI tools, intended for orientation, team discussion, guideline development, and materials for students or teaching.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: schreibzentrum_teaching_resource

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Nutzen Sie diese Seite ... als Grundlage fuer das Entwickeln einer Haltung zur Verwendung von KI-Tools, fuer Diskussionsprozesse im Team, als Orientierung fuer das Entwickeln von Leitfaeden und als Fundus fuer Materialien zur Weitergabe an Studierende oder zum Einbinden in die Lehre.

Localized display only

The page is intended as a basis for developing a stance, team discussions, guideline development, and materials for students or teaching.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities