Policy presence
Queensland University of Technology (QUT) has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Brisbane, Australia
Queensland University of Technology (QUT) has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Queensland University of Technology (QUT) has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Queensland University of Technology (QUT) has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Queensland University of Technology (QUT) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Queensland University of Technology (QUT) has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Queensland University of Technology (QUT) has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Queensland University of Technology (QUT) has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Queensland University of Technology (QUT) has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Queensland University of Technology (QUT) has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: unauthorised_or_inappropriate_technology_can_be_integrity_breach
Original evidence
Evidence 1it is a breach of academic integrity when technology is used inappropriately, or its use is not authorised, and it: replaces or obscures the student’s own academic effort
Teaching
Normalized value: unit_outlines_include_ai_tool_use_statement
Original evidence
Evidence 1The unit outline must include in the assessment items’ descriptions: a statement as to the use of technology such as artificial intelligence tools
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: unit_coordinator_sets_genai_assessment_permission
Original evidence
Evidence 1Your unit coordinator will let you know if you can use GenAI in the preparation or completion of assessment tasks.
Privacy
Normalized value: staff_not_require_non_qut_genai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Due to data security, intellectual property and privacy concerns, staff must not require students to use GenAI for learning and assessment outside of those tools provided by QUT.
0 machine or needs-review claim
3 source attribution
mopp.qut.edu.au
mopp.qut.edu.au
libguides.library.qut.edu.au