Policy presence
Oxford Brookes University has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Oxford, United Kingdom
Oxford Brookes University
Oxford Brookes University is listed as QS 2026 rank 374. Oxford Brookes University has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Oxford Brookes University is listed as QS 2026 rank 374. Oxford Brookes University has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Oxford Brookes University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/oxford-brookes-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Oxford Brookes University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Oxford Brookes University has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Oxford Brookes University has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Oxford Brookes University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Oxford Brookes University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Oxford Brookes University has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Oxford Brookes University has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Oxford Brookes University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Oxford Brookes student guidance states that students are required to declare which AI tools they used and how they used them in Moodle, then paste the emailed receipt into an appendix at the end of the assignment.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: student_ai_use_declaration_required
Original evidence
Evidence 1Oxford Brookes students are required to use the form in Moodle to declare which AI tools you have used and how you have used them. You will be emailed a receipt copy of your completed declaration which you must then paste into an appendix at the end of your assignment.
Ai Tool Treatment
Oxford Brookes describes its university-wide position on generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment as a progressive embrace-and-adapt approach, with module leaders having discretion to advise on AI use in module assessments.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: embrace_and_adapt_module_leader_discretion
Original evidence
Evidence 1Oxford Brookes has taken what JISC would describe as a progressive 'embrace and adapt' approach to generative AI. Currently: Module leaders have the discretion to advise on AI use in the assessment for their modules; Module handbooks should include up to date information on using GenAI in research or assessment; Students are asked to declare their use of AI on submission of assessment and check with module leaders before using it, in line with QAA guidance.
Academic Integrity
Oxford Brookes student guidance says AI tools should not replace the student as author and warns that gaining an unfair advantage using AI tools may breach academic conduct regulations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_unfair_advantage_may_breach_conduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1Remember that AI tools should not be used to replace you as the author of your work. If you gain an unfair advantage using AI tools, you may breach the Oxford Brookes academic conduct regulations.
Privacy
Oxford Brookes guidance says students and staff have access to Microsoft Copilot through an academic institutional licence, but does not recommend uploading confidential or protected data to Copilot because it does not meet Brookes' information-security good-practice expectations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: copilot_available_but_no_confidential_uploads
Original evidence
Evidence 1Oxford Brookes students and staff have access to the data-secure Microsoft Co-pilot AI chatbot, available through a Microsoft academic institutional licence. However, we do not recommend you upload any confidential or protected data or information because Co-pilot does not comply with Brookes' expectations of good practice with regard to information security.
Teaching
Oxford Brookes guidance for schools, programmes, and modules says GenAI principles can be applied across disciplines and should be discussed at programme, course, and module level, with modules addressing equity and academic rigour and programmes advised to develop GenAI literacy and authentic assessment.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: programme_module_genai_principles
Original evidence
Evidence 1These principles can be applied in every subject discipline and programme area. Their specific application should be discussed and agreed at programme/course and module level. Every module should: Principle 1: Ensure equity in student access to GenAI; Principle 2: Uphold academic rigour and integrity. Every programme is advised to: Principle 3: Develop students' GenAI literacy and skills; Principle 4: Adopt authentic assessment.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
5 source attribution
Academic integrity - Oxford Brookes University
brookes.ac.uk
Artificial intelligence - Oxford Brookes University
brookes.ac.uk
GenAI University wide policy and practice - Oxford Brookes University
brookes.ac.uk
Guidance for Schools Programmes and Modules - Oxford Brookes University
brookes.ac.uk
Use AI tools for research - Oxford Brookes University
brookes.ac.uk
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.