Change log

Oxford Brookes University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims5Sources5

University page Public JSON

Oxford Brookes University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # Oxford Brookes University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Oxford Brookes student guidance states that students are required to declare which AI tools they used and how they used them in Moodle, then paste the emailed receipt into an appendix at the end of the assignment.
3+Evidence (en, 011fa6c8cfdf): Oxford Brookes students are required to use the form in Moodle to declare which AI tools you have used and how you have used them. You will be emailed a receipt copy of your completed declaration which you must then paste into an appendix at the end of your assignment.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Oxford Brookes describes its university-wide position on generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment as a progressive embrace-and-adapt approach, with module leaders having discretion to advise on AI use in module assessments.
5+Evidence (en, 639e51207eb7): Oxford Brookes has taken what JISC would describe as a progressive 'embrace and adapt' approach to generative AI. Currently: Module leaders have the discretion to advise on AI use in the assessment for their modules; Module handbooks should include up to date information on using GenAI in research or assessment; Students are asked to declare their use of AI on submission of assessment and check with module leaders before using it, in line with QAA guidance.
6+academic_integrity: Oxford Brookes student guidance says AI tools should not replace the student as author and warns that gaining an unfair advantage using AI tools may breach academic conduct regulations.
7+Evidence (en, 011fa6c8cfdf): Remember that AI tools should not be used to replace you as the author of your work. If you gain an unfair advantage using AI tools, you may breach the Oxford Brookes academic conduct regulations.
8+privacy: Oxford Brookes guidance says students and staff have access to Microsoft Copilot through an academic institutional licence, but does not recommend uploading confidential or protected data to Copilot because it does not meet Brookes' information-security good-practice expectations.
9+Evidence (en, 011fa6c8cfdf): Oxford Brookes students and staff have access to the data-secure Microsoft Co-pilot AI chatbot, available through a Microsoft academic institutional licence. However, we do not recommend you upload any confidential or protected data or information because Co-pilot does not comply with Brookes' expectations of good practice with regard to information security.
10+teaching: Oxford Brookes guidance for schools, programmes, and modules says GenAI principles can be applied across disciplines and should be discussed at programme, course, and module level, with modules addressing equity and academic rigour and programmes advised to develop GenAI literacy and authentic assessment.
11+Evidence (en, ae6f9614bf56): These principles can be applied in every subject discipline and programme area. Their specific application should be discussed and agreed at programme/course and module level. Every module should: Principle 1: Ensure equity in student access to GenAI; Principle 2: Uphold academic rigour and integrity. Every programme is advised to: Principle 3: Develop students' GenAI literacy and skills; Principle 4: Adopt authentic assessment.

Claim changes

5 claim records

academic_integrity

Oxford Brookes student guidance states that students are required to declare which AI tools they used and how they used them in Moodle, then paste the emailed receipt into an appendix at the end of the assignment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

Oxford Brookes describes its university-wide position on generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment as a progressive embrace-and-adapt approach, with module leaders having discretion to advise on AI use in module assessments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Oxford Brookes student guidance says AI tools should not replace the student as author and warns that gaining an unfair advantage using AI tools may breach academic conduct regulations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Oxford Brookes guidance says students and staff have access to Microsoft Copilot through an academic institutional licence, but does not recommend uploading confidential or protected data to Copilot because it does not meet Brookes' information-security good-practice expectations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Oxford Brookes guidance for schools, programmes, and modules says GenAI principles can be applied across disciplines and should be discussed at programme, course, and module level, with modules addressing equity and academic rigour and programmes advised to develop GenAI literacy and authentic assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%Evidence1Languagesen