Nanjing, China (Mainland)

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 18, 2026.

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 18, 2026. Discovery context: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics is listed as QS 2026 rank =680.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 18, 2026 and last changed on May 18, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/nanjing-university-of-aeronautics-and-astronautics.json. The entity-level confidence is 97%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Source status claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources1

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score75/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence82%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Policy presence

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence83%Evidence1Sources1

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence82%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence82%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Source Status

NUAA's Academic Affairs Office notice addresses AI tool use in 2025 undergraduate graduation design/thesis work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: 2025_undergraduate_graduation_design_thesis_ai_notice

Original evidence

Evidence 1
为适应人工智能技术发展,规范我校本科毕业设计(论文)中AI工具的使用,保障学术诚信,提升人才培养质量,...现就有关事项通知如下:

Localized display only

The notice states it regulates AI tool use in the university's undergraduate graduation design/thesis work.

Ai Tool Treatment

For 2025 undergraduate graduation design/thesis work, NUAA says AI tools may only assist research and writing, may not replace independent thinking, and AI-generated content should be separated from personal academic contribution and clearly marked.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: ai_auxiliary_only_and_marked

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI工具只能辅助完成毕业设计(论文)的研究和撰写,不能替代学生的独立思考,AI工具生成的内容应与个人的学术贡献分开,并明确标注。

Localized display only

AI tools may only assist thesis research and writing, cannot replace students' independent thinking, and generated content should be clearly marked.

Academic Integrity

For 2025 undergraduate graduation design/thesis work, NUAA prohibits fully relying on AI for thesis/design writing or research and prohibits using unverified AI-generated content to fabricate data, alter results, or evade plagiarism checks.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: prohibited_core_generation_fabrication_plagiarism_evasion

Original evidence

Evidence 1
禁止完全依赖AI工具进行论文(设计)写作或研究,不得使用AI工具进行研究方案设计、创新性方法设计、算法框架搭建、论文结构设计、数据分析、创新性总结等。...禁止直接使用未经核实的AI工具生成内容,利用AI工具编造、伪造研究数据或篡改实验结果、原始图片等。...禁止通过AI工具对论文进行“同义改写”“结构重组”等操作以规避查重检测。

Localized display only

The notice prohibits fully relying on AI for thesis work or research, fabricating or altering data/results, and using AI rewriting to evade plagiarism checks.

Privacy

For 2025 undergraduate graduation design/thesis work, NUAA says text and data involving privacy or confidentiality must not be uploaded to AI platforms.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: no_privacy_or_confidential_data_uploaded_to_ai_platforms

Original evidence

Evidence 1
涉密内容处理:涉及隐私、保密的文字和数据不得上传至AI平台,确保信息安全。

Localized display only

Text and data involving privacy or confidentiality must not be uploaded to AI platforms.

Academic Integrity

For 2025 undergraduate graduation design/thesis work, NUAA says colleges should conduct AIGC spot checks of at least 10% after plagiarism checks, and a detected AI-generated-content proportion not higher than 40% is treated as passing before final defense.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: aigc_spot_check_minimum_10_percent_threshold_not_higher_than_40_percent

Original evidence

Evidence 1
学院应在抄袭检测后,按不低于10%的比例组织AIGC抽查检测,检测结果显示的智能生成内容比例原则上不高于40%视为通过,检测通过后方能参加最终答辩。

Localized display only

Colleges should conduct AIGC spot checks of at least 10% after plagiarism checks; a generated-content proportion not higher than 40% is treated as passing before final defense.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

1 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities