Policy presence
Maynooth University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Maynooth, Ireland
Maynooth University
Maynooth University has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.
Maynooth University AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Maynooth University has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: Maynooth University is listed as QS 2026 rank 771-780.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Maynooth University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/maynooth-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Maynooth University has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Maynooth University has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Maynooth University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Academic integrity
Maynooth University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Approved tools
Maynooth University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Named AI services
Maynooth University has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: required.
Teaching guidance
Maynooth University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Maynooth University student GenAI guidance says using GenAI in an assignment beyond what is permitted is a breach of academic integrity, including plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_beyond_permitted_breach_academic_integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Using GenAI in an assignment beyond what is permitted is a breach of academic integrity (including plagiarism). For more details, see "Maynooth University Policy on Academic Misconduct and Academic Integrity".
Academic Integrity
For Maynooth University assessments, the student GenAI guidance states that if teaching staff or department guidelines do not clearly indicate GenAI use, no GenAI is permitted.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: no_genai_permitted_unless_clearly_indicated
Original evidence
Evidence 1IF IT IS NOT CLEARLY INDICATED BY TEACHING STAFF AND/OR DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES – NO GENAI IS PERMITTED.
Teaching
Maynooth University student GenAI guidance says GenAI tools will not be used by staff to grade or provide feedback on students' assessed work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: staff_will_not_use_genai_to_grade_or_feedback_assessed_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1Where GenAI use is allowed in assessments, marking criteria will be the same whether or not students choose to use prescribed tools. GenAI tools will not be used by staff to grade or provide feedback on students' assessed work.
Privacy
Maynooth University student GenAI guidance says Microsoft Copilot is accessible to all MU students and that MU currently has a data agreement with Microsoft making its Copilot use GDPR-compliant; the same protection does not apply to free or paid tools not supported by MU.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: copilot_accessible_with_mu_data_agreement_gdpr_compliant
Original evidence
Evidence 1Microsoft’s Copilot is accessible to all MU students, and we currently have a data agreement in place with Microsoft, which means that our use of Copilot is GDPR-compliant. The same protection does not apply when you use free or paid tools which are not supported by MU.
Ai Tool Treatment
Maynooth University student GenAI guidance says GenAI may support learning and assessment when used appropriately and with permission from department lecturers; students should consult department staff about allowed use for each assignment or task.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_use_module_or_assignment_permission_required
Original evidence
Evidence 1GenAI can also be used to support learning (see Section 4 below) and assessment (see Section 5 below) when used appropriately and with the permission of your department lecturers. Consult department staff to find out what type of GenAI use is allowed for each assignment or task.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
Academic Integrity and Generative AI | Maynooth University
maynoothuniversity.ie
Maynooth University Student Guidelines for GenAI
maynoothuniversity.ie
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.