Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Kobe City, Japan
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Kobe University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Kobe University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Kobe University has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Kobe University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Kobe University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Kobe University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Kobe University has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: generative AI output used unchanged in reports may be treated as plagiarism
Original evidence
Evidence 1●作成された文章をそのままレポート等の一部分または全体に利用した場合は、「剽窃」とみなされることがあります。
Localized display only
Using generated text unchanged as part or all of a report may be regarded as plagiarism.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: some classes may restrict or prohibit generative AI use
Original evidence
Evidence 1●授業によっては生成AIの使用自体を制限・禁止する場合があります。
Localized display only
Some classes may restrict or prohibit the use of generative AI itself.
Privacy
Normalized value: do not input highly confidential or personal information into generative AI because of leakage risk
Original evidence
Evidence 1●機密性の高い情報や個人情報などを生成AIに入力することで、それらの情報が流出・漏洩する可能性があります。
Localized display only
Entering highly confidential or personal information into generative AI may lead to leakage or disclosure.
0 machine or needs-review claim
2 source attribution
kobe-u.ac.jp
kobe-u.ac.jp