Gandhinagar, India

Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (IITGN)

Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (IITGN) has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 2 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.

Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (IITGN) AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (IITGN) has 2 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 2 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (IITGN) is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (IITGN) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 2 source-backed claims, including 2 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/indian-institute-of-technology-gandhinagar-iitgn.json. The entity-level confidence is 92%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims2Reviewed2Candidate0Official sources1

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score35/100Coverage labelpartial public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Policy presence

No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coursework

Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (IITGN) has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar (IITGN) has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

IIT Gandhinagar's Honour Code states that students will neither give nor receive unauthorized aid, explicitly or implicitly, for academic activities.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: honour_code_no_unauthorized_aid

Original evidence

Evidence 1
We will neither give nor receive unauthorized aid explicitly or implicitly for any academic activities.

Academic Integrity

IIT Gandhinagar's Honour Code lists plagiarism, including submitting material wholly or substantially identical to another person's created or published work without adequate authorship credit, as an example of conduct that might violate the Honour Code.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: honour_code_plagiarism_violation_example

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Plagiarism: Submission of material that is wholly or substantially identical to that created or published by another person or persons, without adequate credit notations indicating the authorship.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

1 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities