Changsha, China (Mainland)

Hunan University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage2 reviewedEvidence-backed claims2Reviewed2Candidate0Official sources2Source languagezhPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/hunan-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score15/100Coverage labelminimal public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence72%

Policy presence

No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coursework

No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Exams

No source-backed public claim about exam AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about exams, tests, quizzes, or examination conditions.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Research

The Yue Lu Public Governance editorial office states that its journal does not accept manuscripts with generative AI tools as authors, limits generative AI use in submissions to auxiliary research tasks, rejects manuscripts with AI-generated core content or concealed tool use, and requires authors who used generative AI assistance to submit an AIGC tool-use disclosure statement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: journal_submission_aigc_disclosure_and_limits

Original evidence

Evidence 1
本刊不接收任何生成式人工智能工具参与署名的稿件,稿件的原创思想、核心观点、研究设计及主体论证必须由研究者本人独立完成。生成式人工智能工具在投稿中的应用,仅限于语言润色、文献检索、数据整理与分析等辅助研究环节,不得涉及稿件核心内容的生成与创作。

Localized display only

The journal says it does not accept manuscripts with generative AI tools as authors, requires core ideas and arguments to be independently completed by researchers, and limits generative AI use to auxiliary research steps.

Research

For Hunan University's 2026 National Natural Science Foundation application notice, applicants who use generative AI to track research, collect literature, or organize references are instructed to verify AI-generated information and references, take responsibility for generated content, truthfully declare use, label relevant content under cited national rules, and not use directly AI-generated or unverified generated application content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: research_application_ai_use_disclosure_and_verification

Original evidence

Evidence 1
申请人在撰写申请书时,如果借助生成式人工智能技术跟踪研究动态、收集整理参考文献,必须由人工核实生成式人工智能生成信息和参考文献的真实性和准确性。申请人应当对使用的生成内容负责,应当全面如实声明使用情况,按照《人工智能生成合成内容标识办法》《负责任研究行为规范指引(2023)》等国家有关规定对相关内容进行标识。

Localized display only

For 2026 NSFC applications, the notice says applicants using generative AI for research tracking, literature collection, or reference organization must verify AI-generated information and references, take responsibility for generated content, truthfully declare use, and label relevant content.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

《岳麓公共治理》编辑部关于规范生成式人工智能工具使用的声明

pa.hnu.edu.cn

Snapshot hash
51e65f2d4d61f95af58ec510f179e10e20d4412a990bd48177fc5dbb44e84439

国自科——关于做好2026年度国家自然科学基金申请有关工作的通知

kyy.hnu.edu.cn

Snapshot hash
d17506306458ba7d1024e94de269353e85a58e79fec0e3bb16af21d430d9b651

Change log

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities