Atlanta, United States

Georgia Institute of Technology

Georgia Institute of Technology is listed as QS 2026 rank =123. Georgia Institute of Technology has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

Georgia Institute of Technology is listed as QS 2026 rank =123. Georgia Institute of Technology has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Georgia Institute of Technology as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 14, 2026 and last changed on May 14, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/georgia-institute-of-technology.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage6 reviewedSource languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/georgia-institute-of-technology.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Security review claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Named AI services detected in public claims: DeepSeek.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources5

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Privacy and data entry

Georgia Institute of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

Georgia Institute of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

Georgia Institute of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

Georgia Institute of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

Georgia Tech OIT guidance says faculty, staff, and students shall not submit PII, Protected Data, Regulated Data, or Georgia Tech Organizational Data into any AI tool.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: no_pii_protected_regulated_or_organizational_data_in_ai_tools

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Georgia Tech faculty, staff, and students shall not submit any personally identifiable information (PII), Protected Data, Regulated Data or Georgia Tech Organizational Data into any AI tool.

Ai Tool Treatment

Georgia Tech OIT states that DeepSeek is prohibited for Institute-related work, research, or activities involving Georgia Tech data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: deepseek_prohibited_for_institute_work_research_or_gt_data

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Please note that DeepSeek is prohibited for use at Georgia Tech. Due to these concerns, DeepSeek should not be used for Institute-related work, research, or any activities involving Georgia Tech data.

Security Review

Georgia Tech OIT says Institute technology services and tools must undergo comprehensive review, and third-party AI plugins are disabled pending comprehensive risk review.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: ai_tools_require_review_plugins_disabled_pending_risk_review

Original evidence

Evidence 1
All technology services and tools offered at the Institute must undergo a comprehensive review, which includes a series of third-party risk assessments, privacy and security analysis, contractual negotiations, financial and technical support impact assessments, and data stewardship approvals. OIT has disabled the use of third-party AI plugins pending a comprehensive risk review.

Teaching

Georgia Tech CTL course-policy guidance advises instructors to tell students how they should collaborate with and cite GenAI use, and to treat GenAI engagement as an extension of collaboration and academic honesty policies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: instructors_set_syllabus_expectations_for_genai_collaboration_and_citation

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Let your students know your expectations for how they should collaborate with and cite their use of Generative AI (GenAI) platforms, such as Microsoft Copilot or any other approved systems. The best way to develop your AI policy is to consider students' engagement with GenAI as an extension of your collaboration and academic honesty policies.

Academic Integrity

Georgia Tech OIT guidance says faculty should communicate explicitly to students about acceptable GenAI use in classes and academic projects, and students should seek clarification as needed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: faculty_communicate_acceptable_genai_use_students_seek_clarification

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Faculty members should, in the interim, communicate explicitly to their students about the acceptable use of Generative AI in classes and academic projects. Students should also proactively seek clarification from their instructors regarding these policies as required.

Teaching

Georgia Tech OIT academic guidance says courses that wish to embed assessment integrations with AI should directly consult CTL.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: ai_assessment_integrations_should_consult_ctl

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Courses that wish to embed assessment integrations with AI should directly consult CTL.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

5 source attribution

Academic Guidance for Generative AI | Office of Information Technology

oit.gatech.edu

Snapshot hash
edbc5ab301b64e08cfeabb4bde015b8ae26c24170035819d6d851249c62dce98

AI Standards and Guidance | Office of Information Technology

oit.gatech.edu

Snapshot hash
5b95f4447be4c059978a7652de6fc44f8cdcd9495f3f198dbeac99c41b8738ed

Generative AI | Office of Information Technology

oit.gatech.edu

Snapshot hash
bdf615c58571fdaa1031663aea8f37f034f213b0351df499352470334ee6d979

Institutional AI Register | Office of Information Technology

oit.gatech.edu

Snapshot hash
ecee6b5ec3d4abcfd8b1876983f4bc24fd382a28035316dd514346f67a5382fe

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities