Policy presence
Georgia Institute of Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Atlanta, United States
Georgia Institute of Technology is listed as QS 2026 rank =123. Georgia Institute of Technology has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
v1 public contract
Georgia Institute of Technology is listed as QS 2026 rank =123. Georgia Institute of Technology has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Georgia Institute of Technology as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 14, 2026 and last changed on May 14, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/georgia-institute-of-technology.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
Georgia Institute of Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Georgia Institute of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Georgia Institute of Technology has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Georgia Institute of Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Georgia Institute of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: required.
Georgia Institute of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Georgia Institute of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Georgia Institute of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Georgia Institute of Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Georgia Institute of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Georgia Institute of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Normalized value: no_pii_protected_regulated_or_organizational_data_in_ai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Georgia Tech faculty, staff, and students shall not submit any personally identifiable information (PII), Protected Data, Regulated Data or Georgia Tech Organizational Data into any AI tool.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: deepseek_prohibited_for_institute_work_research_or_gt_data
Original evidence
Evidence 1Please note that DeepSeek is prohibited for use at Georgia Tech. Due to these concerns, DeepSeek should not be used for Institute-related work, research, or any activities involving Georgia Tech data.
Security Review
Normalized value: ai_tools_require_review_plugins_disabled_pending_risk_review
Original evidence
Evidence 1All technology services and tools offered at the Institute must undergo a comprehensive review, which includes a series of third-party risk assessments, privacy and security analysis, contractual negotiations, financial and technical support impact assessments, and data stewardship approvals. OIT has disabled the use of third-party AI plugins pending a comprehensive risk review.
Teaching
Normalized value: instructors_set_syllabus_expectations_for_genai_collaboration_and_citation
Original evidence
Evidence 1Let your students know your expectations for how they should collaborate with and cite their use of Generative AI (GenAI) platforms, such as Microsoft Copilot or any other approved systems. The best way to develop your AI policy is to consider students' engagement with GenAI as an extension of your collaboration and academic honesty policies.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: faculty_communicate_acceptable_genai_use_students_seek_clarification
Original evidence
Evidence 1Faculty members should, in the interim, communicate explicitly to their students about the acceptable use of Generative AI in classes and academic projects. Students should also proactively seek clarification from their instructors regarding these policies as required.
Teaching
Normalized value: ai_assessment_integrations_should_consult_ctl
Original evidence
Evidence 1Courses that wish to embed assessment integrations with AI should directly consult CTL.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
5 source attribution
oit.gatech.edu
oit.gatech.edu
ctl.gatech.edu
oit.gatech.edu
oit.gatech.edu
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.