privacy
Georgia Tech OIT guidance says faculty, staff, and students shall not submit PII, Protected Data, Regulated Data, or Georgia Tech Organizational Data into any AI tool.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Georgia Institute of Technology
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Georgia Institute of Technology currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Georgia Institute of Technology current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+12-0
11 # Georgia Institute of Technology AI policy record
2+privacy: Georgia Tech OIT guidance says faculty, staff, and students shall not submit PII, Protected Data, Regulated Data, or Georgia Tech Organizational Data into any AI tool.
3+Evidence (en, 5b95f4447be4): Georgia Tech faculty, staff, and students shall not submit any personally identifiable information (PII), Protected Data, Regulated Data or Georgia Tech Organizational Data into any AI tool.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Georgia Tech OIT states that DeepSeek is prohibited for Institute-related work, research, or activities involving Georgia Tech data.
5+Evidence (en, 5b95f4447be4): Please note that DeepSeek is prohibited for use at Georgia Tech. Due to these concerns, DeepSeek should not be used for Institute-related work, research, or any activities involving Georgia Tech data.
6+security_review: Georgia Tech OIT says Institute technology services and tools must undergo comprehensive review, and third-party AI plugins are disabled pending comprehensive risk review.
7+Evidence (en, ecee6b5ec3d4): All technology services and tools offered at the Institute must undergo a comprehensive review, which includes a series of third-party risk assessments, privacy and security analysis, contractual negotiations, financial and technical support impact assessments, and data stewardship approvals. OIT has disabled the use of third-party AI plugins pending a comprehensive risk review.
8+teaching: Georgia Tech CTL course-policy guidance advises instructors to tell students how they should collaborate with and cite GenAI use, and to treat GenAI engagement as an extension of collaboration and academic honesty policies.
9+Evidence (en, d2ea036bdcb1): Let your students know your expectations for how they should collaborate with and cite their use of Generative AI (GenAI) platforms, such as Microsoft Copilot or any other approved systems. The best way to develop your AI policy is to consider students' engagement with GenAI as an extension of your collaboration and academic honesty policies.
10+academic_integrity: Georgia Tech OIT guidance says faculty should communicate explicitly to students about acceptable GenAI use in classes and academic projects, and students should seek clarification as needed.
11+Evidence (en, bdf615c58571): Faculty members should, in the interim, communicate explicitly to their students about the acceptable use of Generative AI in classes and academic projects. Students should also proactively seek clarification from their instructors regarding these policies as required.
12+teaching: Georgia Tech OIT academic guidance says courses that wish to embed assessment integrations with AI should directly consult CTL.
13+Evidence (en, edbc5ab301b6): Courses that wish to embed assessment integrations with AI should directly consult CTL.
Claim changes
6 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
Georgia Tech OIT states that DeepSeek is prohibited for Institute-related work, research, or activities involving Georgia Tech data.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
Georgia Tech OIT says Institute technology services and tools must undergo comprehensive review, and third-party AI plugins are disabled pending comprehensive risk review.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Georgia Tech CTL course-policy guidance advises instructors to tell students how they should collaborate with and cite GenAI use, and to treat GenAI engagement as an extension of collaboration and academic honesty policies.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Georgia Tech OIT guidance says faculty should communicate explicitly to students about acceptable GenAI use in classes and academic projects, and students should seek clarification as needed.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Georgia Tech OIT academic guidance says courses that wish to embed assessment integrations with AI should directly consult CTL.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
5 source attributions
Academic Guidance for Generative AI | Office of Information Technology
official_guidance checked May 14, 2026
AI Standards and Guidance | Office of Information Technology
official_guidance checked May 14, 2026
Establishing Course Policies - Center for Teaching and Learning
official_guidance checked May 14, 2026
Generative AI | Office of Information Technology
official_guidance checked May 14, 2026
Institutional AI Register | Office of Information Technology
official_guidance checked May 14, 2026