Policy presence
Concordia University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Montreal, Canada
Concordia University
Concordia University is listed as QS 2026 rank =465. Concordia University has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Concordia University is listed as QS 2026 rank =465. Concordia University has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Concordia University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 7 source-backed claims, including 7 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/concordia-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Concordia University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Concordia University has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Concordia University has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Concordia University has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Concordia University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Concordia University has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Concordia University has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Concordia University has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
Concordia University has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Concordia CTL guidance says Concordia has not approved or acquired online AI detectors and therefore staff or faculty use of them is not permitted because of privacy laws and regulations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_detectors_not_permitted_for_staff_or_faculty
Original evidence
Evidence 1At the moment, Concordia has not approved of or acquired the use of any online AI detectors and therefore the use of them by staff or faculty is not permitted due to privacy laws and regulations.
Source Status
Concordia's CTL GenAI FAQ says the university does not currently have an official policy regarding the use of GenAI, and explains that GenAI has not officially been adopted by the university so its use cannot be required in coursework.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: no_current_official_genai_policy_found
Original evidence
Evidence 1The university does not currently have an official policy regarding the use of GenAI. One reason is that GenAI has not officially been adopted by the university, meaning that its use cannot be required in coursework.
Teaching
Concordia CTL encourages faculty to clearly state their position on GenAI use in courses, including in the syllabus and in class, and provides adaptable sample statements for encouraged, limited, or prohibited use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faculty_encouraged_to_state_course_genai_policy
Original evidence
Evidence 1All faculty are encouraged to clearly state their position on the use of GenAI in their courses. This should be stated clearly in the syllabus and should be discussed in class to ensure shared understanding.
Ai Tool Treatment
Concordia CTL assessment guidance says all staff and students have access to Copilot Chat through an institutional Microsoft 365 license, with Concordia authentication and Enterprise Data Protection.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: copilot_chat_available_with_enterprise_data_protection
Original evidence
Evidence 1At Concordia, all staff and students have access to Copilot Chat through an institutional Microsoft 365 license. Copilot Chat is available on the Edge browser or through the link copilot.cloud.microsoft. It requires authentication (using Concordia credentials) and it offers Enterprise Data Protection.
Privacy
Concordia's educational technology guidelines say a Privacy Impact Assessment is required whenever third-party technology uses, shares, or stores personal information, and that a written agreement with Concordia is required after a successful PIA.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: third_party_technology_personal_information_requires_pia_and_agreement
Original evidence
Evidence 1A Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) must be conducted whenever a third-party technology uses, shares, or stores Personal Information. The third party must also sign an agreement with Concordia University following the successful completion of a PIA.
Academic Integrity
Concordia Student Success guidance tells students not to assume GenAI is allowed if an instructor does not mention it, and says permitted use of generative tools for academic work must be cited.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_should_follow_instructor_permission_and_cite_permitted_genai
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do not assume it is allowed if your professor does not mention it. Always read instructions carefully and ask your professor if you need clarification. If you are permitted to use these types of generative tools for your academic work, you must cite them.
Academic Integrity
Concordia's Academic & Behavioural Conduct page identifies the Academic Code of Conduct as the university's official policy on academic integrity.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: academic_code_of_conduct_is_official_academic_integrity_policy
Original evidence
Evidence 1The Academic Code of Conduct is the University's official policy on academic integrity.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
5 source attribution
Academic integrity
concordia.ca
Concordia Educational Technology Guidelines for Faculty and Students
concordia.ca
Guidelines for Teaching with Generative Artificial Intelligence
concordia.ca
Navigate assessment design and generative AI
concordia.ca
Suggestions for using Generative AI in academic writing
concordia.ca
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.