다음과 같은 경우 표절, 위조, 변조 등의 연구부정행위로 간주되어 학위논문 심사 불합격 등의 불이익을 받을 수 있습니다: 생성형 AI가 제공한 정보를 출처 확인 없이 그대로 사용하는 경우; AI 도구를 사용했으나 활용 사실을 은폐하거나, 논문에 명시하지 않은 경우; AI가 생성한 텍스트나 자료를 본인 창작물인 것처럼 명시 없이 사용하는 경우
CUK's General Graduate School warns that using generative AI information without source verification, concealing AI use, or presenting AI-generated text/materials as one's own can be treated as research misconduct in thesis review.
For General Graduate School thesis work, CUK says generative AI use should occur after prior consultation with and under guidance from the student's advisor.
다음과 같은 경우 표절, 위조, 변조 등의 연구부정행위로 간주되어 학위논문 심사 불합격 등의 불이익을 받을 수 있습니다: 생성형 AI가 제공한 정보를 출처 확인 없이 그대로 사용하는 경우; AI 도구를 사용했으나 활용 사실을 은폐하거나, 논문에 명시하지 않은 경우; AI가 생성한 텍스트나 자료를 본인 창작물인 것처럼 명시 없이 사용하는 경우
CUK's General Graduate School warns that using generative AI information without source verification, concealing AI use, or presenting AI-generated text/materials as one's own can be treated as research misconduct in thesis review.
For General Graduate School thesis work, CUK says generative AI use should occur after prior consultation with and under guidance from the student's advisor.
다음과 같은 경우 표절, 위조, 변조 등의 연구부정행위로 간주되어 학위논문 심사 불합격 등의 불이익을 받을 수 있습니다: 생성형 AI가 제공한 정보를 출처 확인 없이 그대로 사용하는 경우; AI 도구를 사용했으나 활용 사실을 은폐하거나, 논문에 명시하지 않은 경우; AI가 생성한 텍스트나 자료를 본인 창작물인 것처럼 명시 없이 사용하는 경우
CUK's General Graduate School warns that using generative AI information without source verification, concealing AI use, or presenting AI-generated text/materials as one's own can be treated as research misconduct in thesis review.
다음과 같은 경우 표절, 위조, 변조 등의 연구부정행위로 간주되어 학위논문 심사 불합격 등의 불이익을 받을 수 있습니다: 생성형 AI가 제공한 정보를 출처 확인 없이 그대로 사용하는 경우; AI 도구를 사용했으나 활용 사실을 은폐하거나, 논문에 명시하지 않은 경우; AI가 생성한 텍스트나 자료를 본인 창작물인 것처럼 명시 없이 사용하는 경우
CUK's General Graduate School warns that using generative AI information without source verification, concealing AI use, or presenting AI-generated text/materials as one's own can be treated as research misconduct in thesis review.
다음과 같은 경우 표절, 위조, 변조 등의 연구부정행위로 간주되어 학위논문 심사 불합격 등의 불이익을 받을 수 있습니다: 생성형 AI가 제공한 정보를 출처 확인 없이 그대로 사용하는 경우; AI 도구를 사용했으나 활용 사실을 은폐하거나, 논문에 명시하지 않은 경우; AI가 생성한 텍스트나 자료를 본인 창작물인 것처럼 명시 없이 사용하는 경우
CUK's General Graduate School warns that using generative AI information without source verification, concealing AI use, or presenting AI-generated text/materials as one's own can be treated as research misconduct in thesis review.
For General Graduate School thesis work, CUK says generative AI use should occur after prior consultation with and under guidance from the student's advisor.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
Teaching guidanceThe Catholic University of Korea (CUK)
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
Status & scope
Scope stated in the cited claims
Original official evidence
No reviewed evidence is included for this topic. This does not establish that no rule exists.
Security and procurement
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
Security and procurementThe Catholic University of Korea (CUK)
Not mentioned in reviewed sources
Status & scope
Scope stated in the cited claims
Original official evidence
No reviewed evidence is included for this topic. This does not establish that no rule exists.
Record updatesLast 90 days
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Update records are not available for this page yet.
Reviewed record
Reviewed claims
3 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity 2 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity
CUK's General Graduate School warns that using generative AI information without source verification, concealing AI use, or presenting AI-generated text/materials as one's own can be treated as research misconduct in thesis review.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%
Normalized value: Unverified, undisclosed, or unattributed generative AI use can be research misconduct in thesis review
Last checked
May 18, 2026
Last changed
May 18, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
다음과 같은 경우 표절, 위조, 변조 등의 연구부정행위로 간주되어 학위논문 심사 불합격 등의 불이익을 받을 수 있습니다: 생성형 AI가 제공한 정보를 출처 확인 없이 그대로 사용하는 경우; AI 도구를 사용했으나 활용 사실을 은폐하거나, 논문에 명시하지 않은 경우; AI가 생성한 텍스트나 자료를 본인 창작물인 것처럼 명시 없이 사용하는 경우
Localized display only
The FAQ warns that using AI-provided information without source checking, concealing AI use, or presenting AI-generated text/materials as one's own may be treated as research misconduct with thesis-review consequences.
Source language
ko
Snapshot hash
75a101ae…
Retrieved
May 18, 2026
Evidence locator
FAQ item 학위논문 작성 시 생성형 AI 활용 유의사항, section 1
Academic Integrity
For General Graduate School thesis work, CUK says generative AI use should occur after prior consultation with and under guidance from the student's advisor.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%
Normalized value: Prior advisor consultation and guidance expected for generative AI in thesis work
Last checked
May 18, 2026
Last changed
May 18, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
반드시 본인의 지도교수님과의 사전 상의 및 지도하에 생성형 AI를 활용하시기 바랍니다.
Localized display only
The FAQ says students should use generative AI only after prior consultation with and under guidance from their advisor.
Source language
ko
Snapshot hash
75a101ae…
Retrieved
May 18, 2026
Evidence locator
FAQ item 학위논문 작성 시 생성형 AI 활용 유의사항, section 1
Research 1 reviewed claim
Research
CUK's General Graduate School says its AI use guideline applies as the basic standard for AI use during degree-thesis writing.
Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Normalized value: General Graduate School degree-thesis AI use guideline applies as basic standard
Last checked
May 18, 2026
Last changed
May 18, 2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1
본 가이드라인은 일반대학원 학위논문 작성 과정에서의 AI 활용에 대한 기본 기준으로 적용됩니다.
Localized display only
This guideline applies as the basic standard for AI use in the General Graduate School degree-thesis writing process.
Source language
ko
Snapshot hash
bf97fbe0…
Retrieved
May 18, 2026
Evidence locator
Notice body, paragraph beginning 본 가이드라인은
Source record
Official sources
2 sources
2 official URLs; 2 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
「가톨릭대학교 일반대학원생을 위한 AI 활용 가이드라인」 안내 | 가톨릭대학교 일반대학원
gs.catholic.ac.kr
University official source
gs.catholic.ac.kr
Hash and captured version
「가톨릭대학교 일반대학원생을 위한 AI 활용 가이드라인」 안내 | 가톨릭대학교 일반대학원 · 2026-05-18T22:11:57Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "The Catholic University of Korea (CUK) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 18, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/the-catholic-university-of-korea-cuk
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
The Catholic University of Korea (CUK) has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
