Bilbao, Spain

University of Deusto

University of Deusto has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 23, 2026.

University of Deusto AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

University of Deusto has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 23, 2026. Discovery context: University of Deusto is listed as QS 2026 rank 1001-1200.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Deusto as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 23, 2026 and last changed on May 23, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-deusto.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage5 reviewedSource languageesPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-deusto.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Source status claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources3

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence74%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

Deusto's March 2024 AI positioning document states that text or other AI-generated resources may not be used literally and must instead be reviewed, reworked, or completed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: ai_generated_resources_not_used_literally

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
AUTORÍA. El texto u otros recursos generados por IA no podrán ser utilizados literalmente, sino que deberán ser revisados, reelaborados o completados.

Widok lokalny only

AI-generated text or resources may not be used literally; they must be reviewed, reworked, or completed.

Source Status

The University of Deusto has an institutional Artificial Intelligence Commission responsible for defining and coordinating the university's AI strategy, promoting training, establishing good practices, and supporting adoption by the university community.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: institutional_ai_commission_and_guidance

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
La Comisión de Inteligencia Artificial (IA) de la Universidad de Deusto es el espacio institucional encargado de definir y coordinar la estrategia de la universidad en torno al uso de la IA, con una mirada ética, humanista y responsable.

Widok lokalny only

The AI Commission is the institutional space responsible for defining and coordinating Deusto's AI strategy.

Ai Tool Treatment

Deusto's AI principles state that faculty, students, researchers, and management staff must communicate their use of AI, understand and assume AI-use risks, and respect privacy, confidentiality, and data-protection criteria when using AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: disclose_ai_use_assume_risks_respect_privacy

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
Todas las personas (profesorado, alumnado, personal investigador y de gestión) deben comunicar el uso de la IA en sus actividades y procesos.

Widok lokalny only

All faculty, students, researchers, and management staff must communicate their use of AI in activities and processes.

Teaching

For each Deusto course, students are directed to review the course programme and learning guide for AI-use rules; those rules must be followed, including where AI use is prohibited.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: course_programme_and_learning_guide_determine_ai_use_rules

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
Para cada asignatura, es necesario revisar el programa de la asignatura y la guía de aprendizaje, donde se establecen las pautas sobre el uso de la IA. Estas normas deben cumplirse en todo momento, también cuando el uso de la IA esté prohibido.

Widok lokalny only

For each course, students must review the programme and learning guide where AI-use rules are established, and those rules must be followed.

Academic Integrity

A Deusto Library citation guide states that, at the university, there is currently no generic prohibition or generic permission for using generative AI, and points users who use generative AI in research or academic work to citation information.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence78%

Normalized value: no_generic_generative_ai_permission_or_prohibition_library_guidance

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
En la Universidad no hay a día de hoy una prohibición o permiso genérico de uso de la inteligencia artificial generativa. Si decides utilizar IAg en una investigación o trabajo académico, en esta página encontrarás información general sobre cómo referenciar su uso en dicho trabajo.

Widok lokalny only

The guide says the university currently has no generic prohibition or permission for generative AI use and gives citation guidance if it is used.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 23, 2026Last changedMay 23, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities