Udine, Italy

Università degli Studi di Udine

Università degli Studi di Udine has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 26, 2026.

Università degli Studi di Udine AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

Università degli Studi di Udine has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 26, 2026. Discovery context: Università degli Studi di Udine is listed as QS 2026 rank 1001-1200.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Università degli Studi di Udine as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 26, 2026 and last changed on May 26, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universita-degli-studi-di-udine.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage5 reviewedSource languageitPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universita-degli-studi-di-udine.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Source status claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources2

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score90/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

Università degli Studi di Udine has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

Università degli Studi di Udine has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Università degli Studi di Udine has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

Università degli Studi di Udine has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

Università degli Studi di Udine has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says that if a student used AI tools at any stage of thesis writing, the student is required to explicitly declare the tool, version if available, date, and nature of use in a methodological note.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: Course-specific Biotechnology thesis guidance requires explicit declaration of AI-tool use.

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
Qualora lo studente abbia utilizzato strumenti di intelligenza artificiale in qualsiasi fase della stesura, e tenuto a dichiararlo esplicitamente in una nota metodologica inserita nella sezione Materiali e metodi o nella Premessa, specificando: lo strumento utilizzato, la versione (se disponibile), la data di utilizzo e la natura dell'utilizzo.

Widok lokalny only

If a student used AI tools at any stage of writing, the guideline requires an explicit methodological note specifying the tool, version if available, date, and nature of use.

Academic Integrity

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says students should not insert automatically generated scientific text into the thesis, replace bibliographic research with AI, or use AI-generated text without critical and personal reworking.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: Course-specific Biotechnology thesis guidance prohibits direct AI-generated thesis text and AI substitution for bibliography work.

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
Usi non consentiti: generazione automatica di testo scientifico da inserire direttamente nella tesi (introduzione, risultati, discussione, conclusioni); sostituzione della ricerca bibliografica: i riferimenti bibliografici devono provenire da banche dati scientifiche (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science) e devono essere letti e verificati personalmente dallo studente; utilizzo di testo generato da IA senza adeguata rielaborazione critica e personale.

Widok lokalny only

The guideline lists as not allowed automatic generation of scientific text for direct insertion, replacing bibliographic research, and use of AI-generated text without adequate critical and personal reworking.

Academic Integrity

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says non-compliance with its AI-use indications is treated as comparable to plagiarism and may lead to disciplinary sanctions under the university regulation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: Course-specific Biotechnology thesis guidance links non-compliant AI use to plagiarism-like treatment and possible discipline.

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
Il mancato rispetto di queste indicazioni e assimilabile al plagio e puo comportare le sanzioni disciplinari previste dal Regolamento d'Ateneo.

Widok lokalny only

Failure to comply is described as comparable to plagiarism and may lead to disciplinary sanctions under the university regulation.

Ai Tool Treatment

For the University of Udine Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline, generative AI tools are described as usable for limited support such as grammar/spelling correction, technical-term translation, and orienting summaries, not as a substitute for the student's own thesis work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Course-specific Biotechnology thesis guidance permits limited support uses of generative AI.

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
Usi consentiti: supporto alla correzione grammaticale e ortografica del testo gia redatto dallo studente; traduzione di termini tecnici o brani in lingua straniera (da verificare sempre con dizionari specialistici); sintesi orientativa di argomenti complessi, da usare come punto di partenza per la consultazione delle fonti primarie originali.

Widok lokalny only

Allowed uses include grammar and spelling support on text already written by the student, technical translation checked against specialist dictionaries, and orienting summaries as a starting point for primary sources.

Source Status

The University of Udine PIAO 2026-2028 provides official source-status evidence that the university planned staff training and process integration around AI, including responsible generative AI in administrative processes, but this source is not a student AI-use policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: PIAO 2026-2028 is official AI-related administrative training context, not student AI policy.

Oryginalny dowod

Evidence 1
formazione diffusa di tipo digitale in ottemperanza alla Direttiva NIS2, in allineamento con gli obiettivi del Piano della transizione digitale, e utilizzo responsabile dell'IA generativa nei processi amministrativi; ... transizione digitale, cyber sicurezza e integrazione dell'intelligenza artificiale nei processi lavorativi

Widok lokalny only

The PIAO describes digital training aligned with NIS2 and responsible use of generative AI in administrative processes, within digital transition, cybersecurity, and AI integration in work processes.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 26, 2026Last changedMay 26, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities