Policy presence
Università degli Studi di Udine has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Udine, Italy
Università degli Studi di Udine has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 26, 2026.
v1 public contract
Università degli Studi di Udine has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 26, 2026. Discovery context: Università degli Studi di Udine is listed as QS 2026 rank 1001-1200.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Università degli Studi di Udine as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 26, 2026 and last changed on May 26, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universita-degli-studi-di-udine.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
Università degli Studi di Udine has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Università degli Studi di Udine has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Università degli Studi di Udine has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Università degli Studi di Udine has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Università degli Studi di Udine has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Università degli Studi di Udine has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Università degli Studi di Udine has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Università degli Studi di Udine has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Università degli Studi di Udine has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: Course-specific Biotechnology thesis guidance requires explicit declaration of AI-tool use.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1Qualora lo studente abbia utilizzato strumenti di intelligenza artificiale in qualsiasi fase della stesura, e tenuto a dichiararlo esplicitamente in una nota metodologica inserita nella sezione Materiali e metodi o nella Premessa, specificando: lo strumento utilizzato, la versione (se disponibile), la data di utilizzo e la natura dell'utilizzo.
Widok lokalny only
If a student used AI tools at any stage of writing, the guideline requires an explicit methodological note specifying the tool, version if available, date, and nature of use.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: Course-specific Biotechnology thesis guidance prohibits direct AI-generated thesis text and AI substitution for bibliography work.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1Usi non consentiti: generazione automatica di testo scientifico da inserire direttamente nella tesi (introduzione, risultati, discussione, conclusioni); sostituzione della ricerca bibliografica: i riferimenti bibliografici devono provenire da banche dati scientifiche (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science) e devono essere letti e verificati personalmente dallo studente; utilizzo di testo generato da IA senza adeguata rielaborazione critica e personale.
Widok lokalny only
The guideline lists as not allowed automatic generation of scientific text for direct insertion, replacing bibliographic research, and use of AI-generated text without adequate critical and personal reworking.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: Course-specific Biotechnology thesis guidance links non-compliant AI use to plagiarism-like treatment and possible discipline.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1Il mancato rispetto di queste indicazioni e assimilabile al plagio e puo comportare le sanzioni disciplinari previste dal Regolamento d'Ateneo.
Widok lokalny only
Failure to comply is described as comparable to plagiarism and may lead to disciplinary sanctions under the university regulation.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: Course-specific Biotechnology thesis guidance permits limited support uses of generative AI.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1Usi consentiti: supporto alla correzione grammaticale e ortografica del testo gia redatto dallo studente; traduzione di termini tecnici o brani in lingua straniera (da verificare sempre con dizionari specialistici); sintesi orientativa di argomenti complessi, da usare come punto di partenza per la consultazione delle fonti primarie originali.
Widok lokalny only
Allowed uses include grammar and spelling support on text already written by the student, technical translation checked against specialist dictionaries, and orienting summaries as a starting point for primary sources.
Source Status
Normalized value: PIAO 2026-2028 is official AI-related administrative training context, not student AI policy.
Oryginalny dowod
Evidence 1formazione diffusa di tipo digitale in ottemperanza alla Direttiva NIS2, in allineamento con gli obiettivi del Piano della transizione digitale, e utilizzo responsabile dell'IA generativa nei processi amministrativi; ... transizione digitale, cyber sicurezza e integrazione dell'intelligenza artificiale nei processi lavorativi
Widok lokalny only
The PIAO describes digital training aligned with NIS2 and responsible use of generative AI in administrative processes, within digital transition, cybersecurity, and AI integration in work processes.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
2 source attribution
uniud.it
uniud.it
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.