Change log

University of Glasgow

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Glasgow currently has 12 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

12 claim records

academic_integrity

Regulation 32 states that assessed student work should not contain content produced by another person, website, software, or AI tool except where AI use is explicitly permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

University of Glasgow IT guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as the only AI service approved for use with University data and says users must be logged in with UofG credentials for approved use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Regulation 32 says use of websites or generative AI software that generates answers or references is prohibited, while some Schools may allow AI tools for specific purposes and any AI use must be referenced.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

research

University of Glasgow researcher guidance states that any use of generative AI tools by staff, students, and researchers must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight by the user.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Glasgow student guidance says using AI or other computational aids in university work without acknowledging the input counts as academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

University of Glasgow IT guidance says confidential or sensitive information belonging to the university or a third party should not be put into AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

research

University of Glasgow researcher guidance says AI tools used as part of research design, methods, disciplinary toolkit, or research subject should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Glasgow student guidance says the university does not seek to prohibit student AI-tool use generally and instead supports effective, ethical, critical, and transparent use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Glasgow staff guidance says Schools are advised by central policy to decide locally whether AI is allowed not at all, under specified circumstances, or without restriction with acknowledgement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

University of Glasgow's PGR GenAI checklist advises PGR students to avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information, including research data and peer review content, to AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Glasgow's GenAI assessment guidance is intended to explain university policy on GenAI tools in assessment practice and outlines three assessment-use scenarios.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Glasgow assessment-design guidance says GenAI use in assessment should not always be treated as plagiarism and encourages assessment design that lets students demonstrate skills beyond knowledge recall.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

8 source attributions

Artificial Intelligence - Info for Staff

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 5:00 AM

Snapshot hash
c5e3f1330f9e51f81d5d8230316172b173c211a89d2c245215c53cbcdadc3b45

University of Glasgow - Artificial Intelligence - Info for Students

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 5:00 AM

Snapshot hash
fbe160c7e8c4720f978e5751563a0bf76f60aff1317cca27621a403cb0ea1c3b