source_status
UFRJ publicly announced preliminary documents on academic integrity and AI-use recommendations for the academic community.
Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agenta
Dziennik zmian
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Podsumowanie zmian
Aktualna świeżość publicznych rekordów i stan weryfikacji.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 maj 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Ta strona łączy wszystkie publiczne diffy wydań dla Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Indywidualne migawki wersji pozostają dostępne pod adresami URL specyficznymi dla danej wersji.
Dla tej uczelni nie zarejestrowano jeszcze różnic między kolejnymi wydaniami. Strona nadal śledzi bieżące twierdzenia poparte źródłami, oficjalne przypisania źródeł, stan przeglądu, aktualność źródeł oraz publicznie dostępny JSON na potrzeby wyszukiwania i cytowania.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Właśnie wyodrębnione twierdzenia to dodania do trackeru i niekoniecznie są nowo opublikowane przez uniwersytet. Zmiany w migawce źródła pokazują zmiany sum kontrolnych dla tego samego URL źródłowego i same w sobie nie stanowią zmian polityki.
Kategorie różnic
Klasyfikacja semantyczna dla tej różnicy wersji.
Połączone diffy wydań
Zjednoczona różnica trackerów wygenerowana ze wszystkich publicznych migawek wydań dla tej uczelni.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro combined release różnica
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro AI policy record
2+source_status: UFRJ publicly announced preliminary documents on academic integrity and AI-use recommendations for the academic community.
3+Evidence (pt-BR, 73070f3a33a5): A Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) tornou público dois documentos preliminares que orientam a comunidade acadêmica sobre o uso ético e responsável da inteligência artificial, em especial nas atividades de ensino e pesquisa.
4+academic_integrity: UFRJ states that delegating monographs, dissertations, and theses to generative AI systems is considered academic dishonesty under the proposed integrity guidance.
5+Evidence (pt-BR, 73070f3a33a5): Simplesmente delegar a responsabilidade de elaboração desses trabalhos a terceiros ou a sistemas de Inteligência Artificial Generativa (IAGen) é considerado desonestidade acadêmica e pode resultar em sanções institucionais, inclusive a perda do título, de acordo com a proposta do documento.
6+ai_tool_treatment: UFRJ guidance allows generative AI to assist preparation and development of academic work, while keeping final responsibility with human authors.
7+Evidence (pt-BR, 73070f3a33a5): As diretrizes também destacam que o uso de ferramentas de IAGen pode auxiliar na preparação e elaboração desses trabalhos, incluindo exploração de temas de pesquisa e organização de ideias, mas a responsabilidade final sobre o conteúdo produzido deve permanecer vinculada à autoria humana.
8+teaching: CRIA/UFRJ recommends that instructors define acceptable and unacceptable generative AI uses in their course teaching plans.
9+Evidence (pt-BR, d18f8d0c7449): Cada professor deve definir claramente, no plano de ensino da sua disciplina, o que constitui uso aceitável e inaceitável de ferramentas de IAG.
10+privacy: CRIA/UFRJ recommends warning researchers about risks of uploading or processing confidential or proprietary third-party data through generative AI tools.
11+Evidence (pt-BR, d18f8d0c7449): Pesquisadores devem ser alertados sobre os riscos de se fazer upload e/ou processar dados/programas confidenciais ou proprietários de terceiros por meio de ferramentas de IAG, pois esses dados poderão ser incorporados no treinamentos futuros de ferramentas.
Historia wydań
0 public release diffs
Zmiany twierdzeń
5 Twierdzenie rekordów
academic_integrity
UFRJ states that delegating monographs, dissertations, and theses to generative AI systems is considered academic dishonesty under the proposed integrity guidance.
Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agenta
ai_tool_treatment
UFRJ guidance allows generative AI to assist preparation and development of academic work, while keeping final responsibility with human authors.
Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agenta
teaching
CRIA/UFRJ recommends that instructors define acceptable and unacceptable generative AI uses in their course teaching plans.
Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agenta
privacy
CRIA/UFRJ recommends warning researchers about risks of uploading or processing confidential or proprietary third-party data through generative AI tools.
Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agenta
Migawki źródłowe
2 source attributions
Recomendações à Reitoria sobre o Uso da Inteligência Artificial na UFRJ
official_pdf Tracker checked at 16 maj 2026, 05:33
UFRJ atualiza diretrizes de integridade acadêmica e propõe recomendações sobre o uso de inteligência artificial
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 maj 2026, 05:30