Change log

The University of Sheffield

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

The University of Sheffield currently has 18 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 23, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 2 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted2Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

The University of Sheffield release diff

Comparing public-release-20260526-001 to public-release-20260526-003.

+6-0
11 # The University of Sheffield AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+academic_integrity: The University of Sheffield says it does not support use of sites that share lecture notes, essays, lab reports, or exam questions.
5+Evidence (en, 88af9e4429b7): The University does not support the use of sites that share content such as lecture notes, essays, lab reports or exam questions.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+privacy: The University of Sheffield tells students not to provide personal, private, or confidential information in GenAI prompts.
10+Evidence (en, 5bf63f04eeb9): You should not provide any personal, private or confidential information in your prompts.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z

Claim changes

18 claim records

academic_integrity

The University of Sheffield tells students that GenAI outputs should not be used as sources for assessment and should never be cited as if they were sources.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

The University of Sheffield says it does not support use of sites that share lecture notes, essays, lab reports, or exam questions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

The University of Sheffield tells students not to provide personal, private, or confidential information in GenAI prompts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

The University of Sheffield warns that unpermitted GenAI use may be treated as unfair advantage even if the student discloses it.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

StudySkills@Sheffield guidance says GenAI detection tools are not used at the University of Sheffield because of error-rate and false-positive or false-negative concerns.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Sheffield PGR guidance says postgraduate researchers' use of generative AI must align with the University's expectations for responsible research and academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

The PGR guidance says researchers must ensure confidential, proprietary, or personally identifiable information is never uploaded to any GenAI platform.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

IT Services productivity principles say only University-approved AI tools should be used for official University business, and staff have access to Google Gemini as the institutionally supported GenAI tool.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

IT Services productivity principles say AI use must comply with GDPR and University data-protection policies, and sensitive or confidential information must not be entered into public or unregulated AI models.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Student academic-integrity guidance tells students to check school or department guidance and module assessment criteria before using GenAI, because use may be prohibited on some modules or assessments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Student academic-integrity guidance says a full disclosure of GenAI-produced content should always be acknowledged, and passing off that content as one's own work counts as academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

IT Services productivity principles say GenAI use is optional except where a team has adopted it for specific tasks, and it is a supportive resource rather than a mandatory requirement for any role.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Sheffield identifies Google Gemini as the institutionally supported GenAI tool for learning and teaching, and says Gemini should be used where possible to support those activities.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

The University of Sheffield says every undergraduate programme integrates GenAI literacy through structured teaching activities and formal assessment, while giving staff and students clarity about acceptable AI use across assessments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

research

The PGR guidance permits students to use generative AI in thesis writing, provided the use is consistent with the guidance and properly declared, and warns that exceeding the guidance risks breaching the Academic Misconduct Policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Assessment guidance says that when GenAI use is allowed, students may be asked to provide full disclosure using an Acknowledge, Describe, Evidence template, while noting that some schools may use a different process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

For student-facing tools outside Google Suite, the University says the New IT Solution Request Process is followed to check data-protection and information-security compliance before those tools are made available on a use-case basis.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

other

University Library copyright guidance says users should ensure third-party copyright material pasted into a GenAI system is suitably licensed or used with the rights owner's permission, and should study model terms carefully.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

8 source attributions