ai_tool_treatment
Sorbonne University's CAPSULE resources page lists Compilatio Magister+ with CAS SU access as a resource for plagiarism prevention and detection of AI-generated content.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Sorbonne University
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Sorbonne University currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Sorbonne University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Sorbonne University combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+12-0
11 # Sorbonne University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules state that assessment documents must be the student's or assessed group's personal work, AI use is refused unless explicitly authorized, and authorized AI use should mention the source.
3+Evidence (fr, 56c3231d216f): L’ensemble des documents produits dans le cadre d’une évaluation doit être l’œuvre personnelle de l’étudiant, de l’étudiante ou du groupe évalué. Lorsque le recours à l’intelligence artificielle (IA) n’est pas explicitement autorisé, il est refusé. Lorsque l’IA est autorisée, il convient de mentionner la source.
4+academic_integrity: Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules treat unauthorized AI-generated work presented as one's own, or authorized AI use without source mention, as plagiarism.
5+Evidence (fr, 56c3231d216f): De même, utiliser l’IA afin de produire des résultats en les donnant pour siens sans y être autorisé, ou l’utiliser en y étant autorisé, mais sans mentionner la source, sera considéré comme relevant du plagiat.
6+privacy: Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations say not to transmit non-public or unpublished content, personal data, confidential data, or sensitive data to a generative AI tool.
7+Evidence (fr, 4f480b67eed5): Ne pas transmettre à un outil d’IA générative de contenu qui ne soit pas public ou déjà publié. Ne pas soumettre à un outil d’IA générative des données personnelles, confidentielles ou sensibles.
8+research: Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations say users should be transparent about generative AI use in research projects and document use when writing scientific documents such as protocols, analysis plans, reports, articles, presentations, dissertations, or theses.
9+Evidence (fr, 4f480b67eed5): Faire preuve de transparence sur l’utilisation d’outils IA générative dans les projets de recherche. Lors de la rédaction de documents scientifiques, tels qu’un protocole de recherche, un plan d’analyse, un rapport, un article, une présentation en congrès, un mémoire, ou une thèse, vous devez documenter l’utilisation de ces outils.
10+research: Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations distinguish translation-only software such as DeepL or Linguee from generative AI tools and say using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT for translation is not recommended.
11+Evidence (fr, 4f480b67eed5): Les logiciels à des fins exclusives de traduction (tels que DeePL ou Linguee) ne sont pas des outils d’IA générative et ne sont donc pas concernés par ces recommandations. À l’opposé, utiliser des outils d’IA générative (tel que ChatGPT) pour la traduction n’est pas recommandé.
12+ai_tool_treatment: Sorbonne University's CAPSULE resources page lists Compilatio Magister+ with CAS SU access as a resource for plagiarism prevention and detection of AI-generated content.
13+Evidence (fr, bcae85926c0c): Compilatio Magister + La prévention et la détection du plagiat et des contenus générés par des IA. La solution Compilatio Magister + regroupe un logiciel détecteur de similitudes des ressources pédagogiques, de plagiat syntaxique et de contenus générés par des IA
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
6 claim records
research
Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations distinguish translation-only software such as DeepL or Linguee from generative AI tools and say using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT for translation is not recommended.
Review: Agent reviewed
research
Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations say users should be transparent about generative AI use in research projects and document use when writing scientific documents such as protocols, analysis plans, reports, articles, presentations, dissertations, or theses.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Sorbonne University's Faculty of Health research recommendations say not to transmit non-public or unpublished content, personal data, confidential data, or sensitive data to a generative AI tool.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules treat unauthorized AI-generated work presented as one's own, or authorized AI use without source mention, as plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules state that assessment documents must be the student's or assessed group's personal work, AI use is refused unless explicitly authorized, and authorized AI use should mention the source.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
3 source attributions
Commission de la formation et de la vie universitaire du conseil academique du 20 juin 2024 - Modalites de controle des connaissances 2024-2025
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:29 AM
Recommandations d'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle generative dans le cadre de la recherche
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:30 AM
Ressources - capsule.sorbonne-universite
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:31 AM