ai_tool_treatment
KTH tells students that generative AI use in graded assignments and exams should follow the course-specific information, and that the teacher's course rule takes precedence over general guidance.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
KTH Royal Institute of Technology currently has 12 source-backed claim records and 9 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
12 claim records
KTH tells students that generative AI use in graded assignments and exams should follow the course-specific information, and that the teacher's course rule takes precedence over general guidance.
KTH staff guidance says that, according to the Faculty Council recommendation, each course at KTH must include course-specific generative AI information in Canvas and the course memo.
KTH student guidance says course-specific generative AI information usually follows one of four approaches: no use, only specific assignments, allowed with guidelines, or free use.
KTH staff guidance says its course-specific AI templates remind students that they are fully responsible for submitted material, explain when AI use must be accounted for, and warn that unauthorised generative AI use may lead to disciplinary action.
KTH teacher guidance says teachers need to assess how possible generative AI use in a course can affect learning and write course-specific information about acceptable use based on that assessment.
KTH teacher guidance says teachers should remove personal data from material given to generative AI tools and ask students to do the same.
KTH legal guidance advises clearing prompts of personal data and says use of generative AI with personal data requires verifying GDPR-related grounds, storage, third-party, and training-data questions.
KTH IT guidance says employees should verify responsibilities, regulations and agreements, and assess ethical consequences, before sharing information with AI tools.
KTH identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as an employee-accessible AI assistant with better information security than the free consumer version when used with a KTH account.
KTH Copilot Chat guidance says the service still may not be used to share personal data, sensitive material, or confidential material.
KTH teacher guidance tells staff to remind students that, in any assessment, students shall honestly disclose help received and sources used.
KTH E-learning FAQ says teachers cannot currently require students to use generative AI, so student use should be voluntary unless the recommendation changes.
9 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 5:55 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 5:55 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 5:55 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 5:55 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 5:55 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 5:55 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 5:55 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 5:55 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 5:55 PM