Change log

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

KTH Royal Institute of Technology currently has 12 source-backed claim records and 9 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

12 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

KTH tells students that generative AI use in graded assignments and exams should follow the course-specific information, and that the teacher's course rule takes precedence over general guidance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

KTH staff guidance says that, according to the Faculty Council recommendation, each course at KTH must include course-specific generative AI information in Canvas and the course memo.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

KTH student guidance says course-specific generative AI information usually follows one of four approaches: no use, only specific assignments, allowed with guidelines, or free use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

KTH staff guidance says its course-specific AI templates remind students that they are fully responsible for submitted material, explain when AI use must be accounted for, and warn that unauthorised generative AI use may lead to disciplinary action.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

KTH teacher guidance says teachers need to assess how possible generative AI use in a course can affect learning and write course-specific information about acceptable use based on that assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

KTH teacher guidance says teachers should remove personal data from material given to generative AI tools and ask students to do the same.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

KTH legal guidance advises clearing prompts of personal data and says use of generative AI with personal data requires verifying GDPR-related grounds, storage, third-party, and training-data questions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

KTH IT guidance says employees should verify responsibilities, regulations and agreements, and assess ethical consequences, before sharing information with AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

KTH identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as an employee-accessible AI assistant with better information security than the free consumer version when used with a KTH account.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

KTH Copilot Chat guidance says the service still may not be used to share personal data, sensitive material, or confidential material.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

KTH teacher guidance tells staff to remind students that, in any assessment, students shall honestly disclose help received and sources used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

KTH E-learning FAQ says teachers cannot currently require students to use generative AI, so student use should be voluntary unless the recommendation changes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

9 source attributions