Change log

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 13, 2026Last changedMay 13, 2026Claims12Sources9

University page Public JSON

KTH Royal Institute of Technology currently has 12 source-backed claim records and 9 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # KTH Royal Institute of Technology AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: KTH tells students that generative AI use in graded assignments and exams should follow the course-specific information, and that the teacher's course rule takes precedence over general guidance.
3+Evidence (en, 583a8f5fd011): First and foremost, you must follow your courses' course-specific information about how generative AI may be used in graded assignments and on the exam. No information on this page takes precedence over what your teacher says applies.
4+teaching: KTH staff guidance says that, according to the Faculty Council recommendation, each course at KTH must include course-specific generative AI information in Canvas and the course memo.
5+Evidence (en, 1399c1c998c0): According to the Faculty Council's recommendation, each course at KTH must include course-specific information about generative AI published in both Canvas and the course memo.
6+ai_tool_treatment: KTH student guidance says course-specific generative AI information usually follows one of four approaches: no use, only specific assignments, allowed with guidelines, or free use.
7+Evidence (en, 4c8618f75491): The information is usually based on one of four common approaches to the use of generative AI: No use of generative AI tools allowed; Only allowed in specific assignments; Allowed according to given guidelines; Free use of generative AI tools.
8+academic_integrity: KTH staff guidance says its course-specific AI templates remind students that they are fully responsible for submitted material, explain when AI use must be accounted for, and warn that unauthorised generative AI use may lead to disciplinary action.
9+Evidence (en, 1399c1c998c0): The templates include: a reminder to students that they are fully responsible for all materials they submit; where relevant, how the use of generative AI should be accounted for; information that the unauthorised use of generative AI may lead to disciplinary action.
10+teaching: KTH teacher guidance says teachers need to assess how possible generative AI use in a course can affect learning and write course-specific information about acceptable use based on that assessment.
11+Evidence (en, c7dd05d24f22): You need to assess how the possible use of generative AI in your course can affect learning and thus the fulfilment of the intended learning outcomes. Based on this, write course-specific information aimed at the students about the acceptable use of generative AI.
12+privacy: KTH teacher guidance says teachers should remove personal data from material given to generative AI tools and ask students to do the same.
13+Evidence (en, c7dd05d24f22): Remove all personal data from the material you provide to the generative AI tool and ask your students to do the same.
14+privacy: KTH legal guidance advises clearing prompts of personal data and says use of generative AI with personal data requires verifying GDPR-related grounds, storage, third-party, and training-data questions.
15+Evidence (en, 09386eed6a2f): You are advised to clear prompts from personal data when using generative AI tools. It is difficult to delete personal data once it has ended up in the training data of the tool, which makes a preliminary purge the safest and easiest method to ensure proper handling of personal data.
16+security_review: KTH IT guidance says employees should verify responsibilities, regulations and agreements, and assess ethical consequences, before sharing information with AI tools.
17+Evidence (en, 721db9c6ede8): Before information is shared, responsibilities, regulations and agreements should be verified, and ethical consequences assessed. In case of uncertainty about data, agreements, laws or responsibilities, guidance should be sought from KTH's lawyers, the Data Protection Officer (DPO), the IT department or the Security Department.
18+ai_tool_treatment: KTH identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as an employee-accessible AI assistant with better information security than the free consumer version when used with a KTH account.
19+Evidence (en, f375d3c47eb7): As an employee at KTH, you have access to Microsoft Copilot Chat, which offers better information security than the free consumer version.
20+security_review: KTH Copilot Chat guidance says the service still may not be used to share personal data, sensitive material, or confidential material.
21+Evidence (en, f375d3c47eb7): It is not permitted to share personal data, sensitive or confidential material in this type of cloud service.

Claim changes

12 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

KTH tells students that generative AI use in graded assignments and exams should follow the course-specific information, and that the teacher's course rule takes precedence over general guidance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

KTH staff guidance says that, according to the Faculty Council recommendation, each course at KTH must include course-specific generative AI information in Canvas and the course memo.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

KTH student guidance says course-specific generative AI information usually follows one of four approaches: no use, only specific assignments, allowed with guidelines, or free use.