Armidale, Australia

University of New England Australia

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage6 reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources4Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-new-england-australia.json

Policy profile

Coverage score90/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

Approved tools

University of New England Australia has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Research

UNE's HDR generative AI guidance says higher degree research candidates are required to consider ethical, critical, and creative uses of generative AI and to ensure proper citation of content generated by AI tools and sources they use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: HDR candidates must acknowledge and cite generative AI use

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Evidence 1
In the planning of a research project, HDR candidates are required to consider the ethical, critical, and creative uses of generative AI and to ensure proper citation of all content generated by AI tools and sources that you use.

Academic Integrity

UNE's HDR generative AI guidance warns that failure to reference generative AI content may be considered academic or research misconduct, and lists risks including unacknowledged AI output, inaccurate AI-generated references, substantive AI-generated thesis or publication content, peer review or ethics-clearance use, and disclosure of sensitive or confidential material to generative AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: HDR GenAI non-acknowledgement and specified uses may raise misconduct risks

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Evidence 1
Failure to reference content from generative AI may be considered academic misconduct or research misconduct... avoid... Using output from generative AI tools without acknowledgment... Including substantive content from a generative AI tool into your HDR thesis or publication... Breaching data privacy, security, copyright, intellectual property, or confidentiality...

Academic Integrity

UNE's Student Academic Integrity Policy includes artificial intelligence tools in its example of work substantially written by someone else, within the policy's breach framework for undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award coursework students; the policy states it does not apply to higher degree by research courses.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: AI tools included in coursework academic integrity breach examples; HDR excluded from this policy

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Evidence 1
This Policy applies to all students enrolled in undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award courses offered by UNE... The Policy does not apply to higher degree by research courses. Breaches... include... work substantially written by someone else... artificial intelligence tool, or other tool.

Privacy

UNE's HDR generative AI guidance cautions that inputting research data into AI can risk loss of copyright or intellectual property control and can have serious implications if sensitive or highly sensitive data is inadvertently released.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: HDR research data input to AI is flagged as privacy/IP risk

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Evidence 1
Inputting any research data into AI, is at the risk of losing copyright/intellectual property rights... This could have significant ramifications... if you inadvertently release sensitive or highly sensitive data.

Ai Tool Treatment

A UNE School of Education public myLearn information page tells students that computer programs, artificial intelligence tools, or other tools should not be used to write or produce any part of an assessment response unless explicitly referenced and in line with unit coordinator advice for the assessment task.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: School of Education page: AI assessment use requires explicit referencing and unit coordinator advice

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Evidence 1
tools including computer programs, artificial intelligence tools or other tools should NOT be used to write, or produce, any part of your assessment response unless it has been explicitly referenced and in line with advice by the unit coordinator in your assessment task.

Source Status

UNE's public Learning Online academic integrity myLearn section states that a Generative AI and Academic Integrity at UNE module exists and lists module topics including general principles for use of generative AI, Turnitin detection and AI, and referencing generative AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: Public myLearn source confirms GenAI academic integrity module topics, but full module content is separate

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Evidence 1
Discover Generative AI and Academic Integrity at UNE and learn UNE's stance and how you can ethically use Generative AI... Generative AI Modules: What is Generative AI? General Principles for Use of Generative AI. TurnItIn Detection and AI. Referencing Generative AI. Example Case Study.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 24, 2026Last changedMay 24, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities