Milan, Italy

University of Milan

Name: University of Milan AI Policy Tracker record
Creator: University AI Policy Tracker
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

RanglijstQS World University Rankings 2026: =276Updated19 jul 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

7 reviewed claims

Genormaliseerde waarde: {"tool":"chatgpt","rawToolName":"ChatGPT Edu","description":"University of Milan makes a convention-priced ChatGPT Edu licence available to teaching and research staff through its ICT-directed order process.","howToObtain":"A department administrator submits the licence request during a CRUI purchase window using project funds; after assignment, use the university email and institutional credentials.","costToUser":"EUR 7.05 plus VAT per month, charged to project funds.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Laatst gecontroleerd: 16 jul 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 16 jul 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

L'Università degli Studi di Milano, nell'ambito dell'accordo stipulato dalla CRUI per l'adozione di strumenti di Intelligenza Artificiale, mette a disposizione del solo personale docente e ricercatore la possibilità di acquistare in convenzione la licenza ChatGPT Edu. La Direzione ICT invia l'ordine delle licenze alla CRUI; le licenze sono assegnate agli utenti indicati nelle richieste di acquisto.
Bron: ChatGPT Edu - Università degli Studi di Milano

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

L'Università degli Studi di Milano, nell'ambito dell'accordo stipulato dalla CRUI per l'adozione di strumenti di Intelligenza Artificiale, mette a disposizione del solo personale docente e ricercatore la possibilità di acquistare in convenzione la licenza ChatGPT Edu. La Direzione ICT invia l'ordine delle licenze alla CRUI; le licenze sono assegnate agli utenti indicati nelle richieste di acquisto.

Brontaal: it
Snapshot-hash: 383325ee…
Opgehaald: 16 jul 2026

Genormaliseerde waarde: no_ai_delegation_for_final_grade_assessment

Laatst gecontroleerd: 16 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 16 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

It is never permitted to delegate any learning assessment activity to AI tools when such activity involves an assessment that contributes to the final exam grade. Self-assessment aimed at improving learning is instead permitted and promoted provided it is made explicit in the tools and methods of use.
Bron: Guidelines for Beneficial Use of AI in Educational Settings

Brontaal: English (en)
Snapshot-hash: ae70cab6…
Opgehaald: 16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator: Section 2.1, For teachers

Genormaliseerde waarde: declare_ai_use_in_teaching_and_assessed_work

Laatst gecontroleerd: 16 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 16 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

For teachers: any use of AI tools in educational activities must be made explicit and declared, both regarding the specific tool used and the methods of use. For students: any use of AI tools in producing work subject to assessment must be made explicit and declared, specifying the methods of use and purposes.
Bron: Guidelines for Beneficial Use of AI in Educational Settings

Brontaal: English (en)
Snapshot-hash: ae70cab6…
Opgehaald: 16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator: Section 2.1, For teachers / For students

Genormaliseerde waarde: research_ai_responsibility_transparency_respect

Laatst gecontroleerd: 16 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 16 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

This is why the University advises its research staff to learn about, exploit, and systematically implement the best existing tools while, at the same time, urging them to always do so while respecting three fundamental principles that must characterize the entire process of using these tools: responsibility, transparency, and respect. Throughout the entire research process... the researcher... must at all times understand that they are fully responsible for all results produced by the tools used, regardless of AI use or not.
Bron: Guidelines for Beneficial Use of AI in Research

Brontaal: English (en)
Snapshot-hash: 96635ec6…
Opgehaald: 16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator: Opening section and Section 2.1 Responsibility

Genormaliseerde waarde: ai_governance_guidelines

Laatst gecontroleerd: 16 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 16 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

The goal of the document "Governing Artificial Intelligence within the University" is to promote an ethical, legally-compliant and conscious use of AI tools, by implementing the latest regulatory provisions on the subject, as well as best practices already adopted by many universities and research centres in Italy and abroad. The ten general principles stated in this document are accompanied by three Annexes containing specific guidelines for the use of AI in the areas of teaching, research and the third mission, and administrative activities.
Bron: Governing AI within the University

Brontaal: English (en)
Snapshot-hash: 4984f8d3…
Opgehaald: 16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator: Main body text under Governing AI within the University

Genormaliseerde waarde: research_ai_data_protection_traceability

Laatst gecontroleerd: 16 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 16 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

In any case, data protection, operation traceability, and regulatory compliance must be guaranteed throughout the entire analysis process. The idea of respect then includes the need to correctly treat information entered into AI systems by respecting both privacy and data protection. Avoiding inserting particularly sensitive data into AI systems achieves both the objective of protecting the University's industrial secrets... and the rights and freedoms of people to whom any personal and sensitive data may refer.
Bron: Guidelines for Beneficial Use of AI in Research

Brontaal: English (en)
Snapshot-hash: 96635ec6…
Opgehaald: 16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator: Use of AI systems for data analysis; Section 2.3

Genormaliseerde waarde: administrative_ai_agid_methodology_requirements

Laatst gecontroleerd: 16 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd: 16 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1

As a public university, Universita degli Studi di Milano... promotes the adoption of AI tools in compliance with AGID guidelines for AI adoption in Public Administration. The following categories of requirements are particularly taken into consideration in the analysis phase: AI Act compliance; data management and quality; personal data protection; cybersecurity, in compliance with AGID guidelines.
Bron: Guidelines for Beneficial Use of AI in Administrative Activities

Brontaal: English (en)
Snapshot-hash: 4de0e775…
Opgehaald: 16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator: Sections 1 and 2, administrative activities guidelines

Source record

Officiële bronnen

5 sources

ChatGPT Edu - Università degli Studi di Milano

work.unimi.it

Bron-URL: https://work.unimi.it/servizi/servizi_tec/134389.htm
Snapshot-hash: 383325ee…

Governing AI within the University

unimi.it

Bron-URL: https://www.unimi.it/en/university/governance-and-strategy/strategic-guidelines/strategic-plan/artificial-intelligence-university-milan/governing-ai-within-university
Snapshot-hash: 4984f8d3…

Guidelines for Beneficial Use of AI in Administrative Activities

unimi.it

Bron-URL: https://www.unimi.it/sites/default/files/regolamenti/Allegato%203_decalogo%20AI%20EN.pdf
Snapshot-hash: 4de0e775…

Guidelines for Beneficial Use of AI in Educational Settings

unimi.it

Bron-URL: https://www.unimi.it/sites/default/files/regolamenti/Allegato%201_decalogo%20AI%20EN.pdf
Snapshot-hash: ae70cab6…

Guidelines for Beneficial Use of AI in Research

unimi.it

Bron-URL: https://www.unimi.it/sites/default/files/regolamenti/Allegato%202_decalogo%20AI%20EN.pdf
Snapshot-hash: 96635ec6…

Record information, JSON & citation

Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen97%Snapshot statusNiet gepubliceerdJSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Milan AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-milan

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen

University of Milan

No reviewed summary yet

Beoordeelde beweringen

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Milan in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

For educational activities, the University of Milan permits AI-supported self-assessment when explicit, but does not permit delegating learning assessment to AI tools when the assessment contributes to the final exam grade.

In educational settings, the University of Milan advises that students must explicitly declare AI use in assessed work and that teachers must explicitly declare AI use in educational activities.

For research, the University of Milan advises research staff to use AI while respecting responsibility, transparency, and respect, and says researchers remain fully responsible for results produced with AI tools.

The University of Milan has an AI governance document intended to promote ethical, legally compliant and conscious use of AI tools, with annexed guidelines for teaching, research, third mission and administrative activities.

For AI use in research, the University of Milan guidance emphasizes data protection, operation traceability and regulatory compliance during AI-supported data analysis, and cautions against entering sensitive information into AI systems.

For administrative activities, the University of Milan says its AI adoption follows AGID public-administration guidelines and uses a methodology that considers AI Act compliance, data quality, personal data protection and cybersecurity requirements.

Officiële bronnen

ChatGPT Edu - Università degli Studi di Milano

Governing AI within the University

Guidelines for Beneficial Use of AI in Administrative Activities

Guidelines for Beneficial Use of AI in Educational Settings

Guidelines for Beneficial Use of AI in Research