Wel doen
- Read the course’s AI limits.
- Use the licensed product within data restrictions.
- Keep the decision and court-appeal window.

Gothenburg, Sweden
Student guide · Task scope and procedure
Course decisions govern AI and licensed access. Detectors are not proof; disciplinary court appeal has a three-week receipt trigger and a separately granted stay.
De onderstaande richtlijnen zijn in het Engels; officiële bewijsstukken behouden hun oorspronkelijke taal.
Er is nog geen volledige samenvatting van de studentenregels; bekijk de verzamelde uitspraken en bronnen.
Course decisions govern AI and licensed access. Detectors are not proof; disciplinary court appeal has a three-week receipt trigger and a separately granted stay.



Aanvulling verzameld: 2026-10-09 · Huidige toepasselijkheid niet onafhankelijk bevestigd
Samenvatting momenteel beschikbaar in het Engels
Interpretatie van de site
Course-level rules depend on learning outcomes and must clearly state permitted, restricted or prohibited GenAI use. Students must follow the applicable limits. If a course requires GenAI, all students must have access to the same licence.
Reikwijdte: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Detectiebewijs · Ondersteuning en aanpassingen
Reikwijdte: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
Course-specific decisions, not universal assessment permission.
Policies on the use of generative AI vary across courses, programmes, departments and faculties. It is your responsibility to make sure you are familiar with the policy that applies to your studies.
About the guidance
This guidance outlines the principles that frame decisions on the use of generative AI in courses at the University of Gothenburg. It also clarifies students’ responsibility to comply with those decisions.
This guidance outlines information relevant to all students, such as:
the principles underlying course policies on generative AI,
the definition and limitations of generative AI, products licensed by the University, and how generative AI may affect learning,
the rules and regulations governing the use of generative AI during examinations, and what is considered cheating.
Differences between courses
Decisions about the use of generative AI in university courses are based on three things:
the course’s intended learning outcomes
existing rules and regulations
the University’s vision, values, and sustainability commitments.
Since learning outcomes vary across courses, programs, and departments, generative AI policies will vary too.
Course-specific decisions about generative AI
Decisions on the use of generative AI are made at the course level based on the course’s intended learning outcomes. The decisions must align with the University’s rules and regulations, mission and values, and its commitment to integrating sustainable development into all operations, including teaching.
Course-specific decisions about generative AI must be clearly communicated to students, together with an explanation of when the use of generative AI is permitted, restricted, or prohibited. Students are responsible for following these decisions and abiding by any course-specific limitations on the use of generative AI in coursework and examinations. If students are required to use generative AI in a course, all students must have access to the same licence.
Generative AI and the University’s vision and values
The University of Gothenburg is a government authority and operates within a framework of laws, regulations, and public responsibilities.
As a government authority, the University is required to work for sustainable development and provide evidence-based education that benefits society as a whole.
This means that the use of generative AI may be limited or prohibited in courses based on considerations related to learning, data protection and privacy, GDPR, ethics and sustainability. For more information, please see Vision and values on gu.se.Bekijk officiële bron ↗Verzameld: 2026-10-09 · 217–236
SHA-256: efdfc1e6b07572bb392bd3a32649133774ada49a9b8c8a2c0da4bff838aec170
Interpretatie van de site
Assessment must reflect the student’s individual performance. AI-generated content must not be presented as your work or prevent assessment of your knowledge. Take-home aids may be permitted as a rule, but course AI restrictions remain; suspected cheating is investigated and unresolved suspicion reported to the Vice-Chancellor.
Reikwijdte: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Detectiebewijs · Ondersteuning en aanpassingen
Reikwijdte: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
Generative AI and the rules for examinations
In the context of examinations, the University of Gothenburg considers generative AI a “tool” governed by the Rules for Studies at the First- and Second-Cycle Level. The rules especially relevant to the use of generative AI are listed below. Click on the text to read the explanation.
Grading decisions are to be based on the individual student’s performance in relation to the intended learning outcomes of the course. (Section B, rule 28)
Examiners must assess a student’s individual performance when determining the student’s grade. Consequently, you are not permitted to submit AI-generated content as your own work, or to use it in ways that prevent your teacher from assessing your own knowledge and abilities during examinations.
If an examiner suspects that a student has used generative AI to cheat during an examination, the case must be investigated. If the suspicion remains after the investigation, the case is reported to the Vice-Chancellor and may be considered by the University’s Disciplinary Board.
Students shall be informed of aids that are permitted or prohibited for use during an examination. (Section B, rule 37)
In some courses, generative AI products can be considered prohibited aids. The course coordinator must therefore inform students about the rules governing the use of generative AI in relation to examinations. This information should be provided in a timely manner, so students have adequate time to prepare for the examination.
Students are responsible for familiarising themselves with the applicable rules for examination for their own course. (Section B, rule 39)
Students are responsible for reading and following the rules and regulations governing the use of generative AI in their courses.
As a rule, all aids are permitted for take-home examinations, written tasks or equivalent. (Section B, rule 95)
Since generative AI products can be considered aids, generative AI use may be permitted, restricted, or prohibited at the course level for take-home examinations, written tasks, or similar assignments. If a student is allowed to use generative AI, that student may not present AI-generated content as their own work, as this is considered cheating.Bekijk officiële bron ↗Verzameld: 2026-10-09 · 255–265
SHA-256: efdfc1e6b07572bb392bd3a32649133774ada49a9b8c8a2c0da4bff838aec170
Interpretatie van de site
Disciplinary measures are a warning or suspension up to six months; six weeks is the most common cheating measure, not an automatic AI penalty. Students may respond and continue teaching and examinations pending a decision, and receive GUS support.
Reikwijdte: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Reikwijdte: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
Common and maximum sanctions distinguished; no automatic finding.
Disciplinära åtgärder
De disciplinära åtgärderna är varning eller avstängning från utbildningen i maximalt sex månader. Den vanligaste åtgärden som beslutas när en student försökt vilseleda vid examination är avstängning från utbildningen i sex veckor.
Avstängning från studier
En avstängning börjar vanligtvis gälla från dagen efter disciplinnämndens sammanträde. Under avstängningen får du inte:
Delta i undervisning, laborationer eller annat arbete inom ramen för utbildningen vid Göteborgs universitet.
Vistas i universitetets undervisningslokaler.
Delta i prov eller studieresor.
Avstängningen kan påverka din rätt till studiemedel från CSN.
Varning
Om disciplinnämnden beslutar om varning kan du fortsätta dina studier som vanligt. Disciplinnämnden kan se allvarligare på en ny disciplinär förseelse om du tidigare har meddelats en varning.
Anmälan och handläggning
Om du blivit anmäld misstänkt för en disciplinär förseelse kommer du att kontaktas via den e-postadress som universitet tillhandahåller, om du inte själv angett en annan e-postadress. Du kommer ha möjlighet att bemöta och ge förklaring till uppgifterna i anmälan. I avvaktan på beslut i disciplinärendet får du delta i undervisning och examinationer.
Det finns en handläggningsordning som beskriver hur handläggningen av disciplinärendet går till och hur ansvaret för uppgifter i handläggningen är fördelat inom Göteborgs universitet.
Ladda ner handläggningsordningen på sidan Lagar och regler som styr utbildningen
Ditt stöd vid en anmälan
Stöd och råd från GUS student- och doktorandombud
Du har rätt till stöd och hjälp från GUS (Göteborgs universitets studentkårer) student- och doktorandombud. GUS-ombuden finns tillgängliga som resurs för dig om du känner att du behöver:Bekijk officiële bron ↗Verzameld: 2026-10-09 · 210–226
SHA-256: cb93bd33d916f954a5094bdd5d1fa94da5ce2686eb63ea3d8a0a68bf9691e279
Interpretatie van de site
A warning or suspension may be appealed to Gothenburg Administrative Court; the appeal must reach the university within three weeks from the day the student received the decision. A stay of suspension must be requested and granted by the court; filing alone does not pause it.
Student · Verplicht bij deze procedure
Binnen de vermelde termijn. Controleer startpunt, reikwijdte en uitzonderingen in de samenvatting en oorspronkelijke tekst.
Reikwijdte: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Reikwijdte: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
Överklagande
Om du tycker att disciplinnämndens beslut om avstängning eller varning är felaktigt kan du överklaga det till Förvaltningsrätten i Göteborg. GUS-ombuden kan hjälpa dig att skriva ett överklagande.
Ett överklagande kan skickas via e-post till registrator på e-postadress registrator@gu.se, alternativt postas till följande adress:
Registrator
Göteborgs universitet
Box 100
405 30 Göteborg
Överklagandet ska ha kommit in till Göteborgs universitet inom tre veckor från den dag då du fick ta del av beslutet. Efter att överklagandet har kommit in så överlämnas det och övriga handlingar i ärendet till Förvaltningsrätten i Göteborg.
Inhibition
Om du blivit avstängd kan du i överklagandet även begära inhibition. Om Förvaltningsrätten beviljar inhibition, innebär det att verkställandet av avstängningen tillfälligt pausas i avvaktan på Förvaltningsrättens slutliga dom.Bekijk officiële bron ↗Verzameld: 2026-10-09 · 268–277
SHA-256: cb93bd33d916f954a5094bdd5d1fa94da5ce2686eb63ea3d8a0a68bf9691e279
Interpretatie van de site
Where course use is permitted or required, students should use university-procured products. All students have Copilot access; only some courses provide ChatGPT Edu. Even with a university licence, copyright-protected material, personal data or other sensitive information must not be uploaded.
Reikwijdte: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Reikwijdte: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
ChatGPT Edu is course-dependent; access does not authorise an assessment.
Licensed products
If you, as a student, are permitted or required to use generative AI in a course, you should use licensed products procured by the University of Gothenburg, since these are provided under agreements governing how user data is processed and stored. At the time of writing, all students have access to a University-procured Copilot (Microsoft) licence. Some students may also receive access to a ChatGPT Edu (OpenAI) licence when enrolled in certain courses. As stated above, if students are required to use generative AI in a course, all students must have access to the same licence.
Copyright or sensitive information
Even when using a University-procured licence, students may not upload material that is protected by copyright or that contains personal data or other sensitive information.
Students should be aware that AI-generated content may closely resemble material created by humans. In such cases, AI-generated content may be subject to copyright, and students should not assume that they own or may freely use content generated by an AI product.
Furthermore, under current legislation, copyright protection only applies to works created by humans. This means that content generated by AI is generally not protected by copyright law.
Copyright may arise in works created with the assistance of AI when the human contribution is sufficiently original and substantial.Bekijk officiële bron ↗Verzameld: 2026-10-09 · 241–247
SHA-256: efdfc1e6b07572bb392bd3a32649133774ada49a9b8c8a2c0da4bff838aec170
Interpretatie van de site
The university considers AI detectors unreliable and does not accept detector reports as proof that the student produced the submitted examination work. Questions about course rules should go to the course coordinator.
Reikwijdte: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Reikwijdte: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university
Detector rule is separate from similarity/plagiarism checks.
Generative AI detection products
The University considers AI-detection products unreliable and therefore does not accept AI-detection reports as proof that a student produced the work they submitted for examination.
Additional guidance
If you have questions about using generative AI for coursework and examinations, contact your course coordinator.Bekijk officiële bron ↗Verzameld: 2026-10-09 · 269–272
SHA-256: efdfc1e6b07572bb392bd3a32649133774ada49a9b8c8a2c0da4bff838aec170
Gepubliceerde brongebaseerde aanvullingen. Engelse samenvattingen en oorspronkelijke citaten staan los van het beoordeelde dossier. Mogelijke procedures en uitkomsten zijn geen automatische straffen voor AI. De huidige toepasselijkheid is niet onafhankelijk bevestigd; controleer de bronreikwijdte en versie.
Vergeleken met opgeslagen tekst; geen officiële vertaling
Hashes maken vergelijking van opgeslagen teksten mogelijk; ze bevestigen geen actuele geldigheid of onveranderlijkheid. De onderwerpen vormen geen verplichte volgorde.
Toegang is geen toestemming voor gebruik bij een beoordeling. Controleer opdrachtregels, toegelaten gebruikers en databeperkingen.
Gearchiveerd record; raadpleeg de officiële bron voor actuele toegang. Toegangsgegevens en citaten blijven in de oorspronkelijke taal.
Oorspronkelijk citaat
University of Gothenburg PIL guidance says all staff and students have access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu, and Microsoft 365 Copilot can be requested with manager approval because its cost is charged to the department or equivalent.Oorspronkelijk citaat
It is also possible to request access to the extended version of Copilot, Microsoft 365 Copilot; however, this service comes with a cost that is charged to the department or equivalent, and therefore an order requires approval from a manager.Oorspronkelijk citaat
University of Gothenburg PIL guidance says all staff and students have access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu, and Microsoft 365 Copilot can be requested with manager approval because its cost is charged to the department or equivalent.Oorspronkelijk citaat
At present, all staff and students have access to the chat service Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat.Oorspronkelijk citaat
University of Gothenburg PIL guidance says all staff and students have access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu, and Microsoft 365 Copilot can be requested with manager approval because its cost is charged to the department or equivalent.Oorspronkelijk citaat
At present, all staff and students have access to the chat service Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat.Oorspronkelijk citaat
It is also possible to request access to the extended version of Copilot, Microsoft 365 Copilot; however, this service comes with a cost that is charged to the department or equivalent, and therefore an order requires approval from a manager.University of Gothenburg gives all employees access to a login-protected Microsoft Copilot version.
Use the employee user account.
Not specified by the cited source.
Oorspronkelijk citaat
All employees have access to a login-protected version of the AI tool Microsoft Copilot via their user account.The student guide provides university-procured Copilot access to all students. Course rules still govern; copyright-protected material, personal or sensitive data must not be uploaded even with the university licence.
Use university-procured access and follow course instructions.
No separate user price established by this guide.
Datum broncontrole aanvulling:
Oorspronkelijk citaat
Licensed products
If you, as a student, are permitted or required to use generative AI in a course, you should use licensed products procured by the University of Gothenburg, since these are provided under agreements governing how user data is processed and stored. At the time of writing, all students have access to a University-procured Copilot (Microsoft) licence. Some students may also receive access to a ChatGPT Edu (OpenAI) licence when enrolled in certain courses. As stated above, if students are required to use generative AI in a course, all students must have access to the same licence.
Copyright or sensitive information
Even when using a University-procured licence, students may Oorspronkelijk citaat
not upload material that is protected by copyright or that contains personal data or other sensitive information.Some courses may provide a ChatGPT Edu licence; the guide does not promise access for every student. Required course use must provide the same licence to all enrolled students. Data and task restrictions remain.
Access only if provided in the particular course.
Not established beyond the course-provided licence.
Datum broncontrole aanvulling:
Oorspronkelijk citaat
Licensed products
If you, as a student, are permitted or required to use generative AI in a course, you should use licensed products procured by the University of Gothenburg, since these are provided under agreements governing how user data is processed and stored. At the time of writing, all students have access to a University-procured Copilot (Microsoft) licence. Some students may also receive access to a ChatGPT Edu (OpenAI) licence when enrolled in certain courses. As stated above, if students are required to use generative AI in a course, all students must have access to the same licence.
Copyright or sensitive information
Even when using a University-procured licence, students may Oorspronkelijk citaat
not upload material that is protected by copyright or that contains personal data or other sensitive information.Reviewed record
Beoordeelde uitspraken: 9
Academic Integrity
Genormaliseerde waarde: AI-generated content may not be presented as own work; examiner should specify permitted-use limits
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1With regard to the use of generative AI tools, AI-generated content may not be presented as one’s own work, as this is considered misleading. In the task instructions, the examiner should specify the limits for the permitted use of generative AI tools.
Academic Integrity
Genormaliseerde waarde: unauthorized generative AI use can count as cheating
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1Generativ AI kan skapa nytt innehåll. Universitetet förbjuder inte användning av generativ AI, men det räknas som fusk om du använder det för att: Genomföra en examinationsuppgift som du som student förväntas göra själv; Presenterar AI-genererad text eller annat material som om det vore ditt eget arbete; Även andra sätt att använda generativ AI kan vara otillåtna i din kurs eller i ditt program.
Academic Integrity
Genormaliseerde waarde: AI-detection tools not recommended because existing tools are unreliable
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1Det är viktigt att notera att universitetet inte rekommenderar att kontrollera ditt arbete med en AI-detektionsverktyg eftersom befintliga verktyg är opålitliga.
Onderwijs
Genormaliseerde waarde: guidelines vary by course/programme/department/faculty; teachers/examiners communicate them
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1Riktlinjer för generativ AI varierar mellan kurser, program, avdelningar och fakulteter. Det är lärare och examinatorer som ansvarar för att kommunicera riktlinjer kring generativ AI till studenter.
Privacy
Genormaliseerde waarde: do not share personal data or sensitive information with unreviewed services; caution also stated for Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1There is also some complexity regarding the use of services not offered through the university since they have not been scrutinized from, for example, legal perspectives, or in terms of security. Therefore, users of these services are advised to exercise caution. It is, for instance, very important not to share any personal data or sensitive information. This also applies to Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot at present, even though it is offered through the university.
Ai Tool Treatment
Genormaliseerde waarde: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"University of Gothenburg gives all employees access to a login-protected Microsoft Copilot version.","howToObtain":"Use the employee user account.","costToUser":"Not specified by the cited source.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"not_specified"}
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1All employees have access to a login-protected version of the AI tool Microsoft Copilot via their user account.
Gelokaliseerde weergave only
All employees have access to a login-protected version of the AI tool Microsoft Copilot via their user account.
Ai Tool Treatment
Genormaliseerde waarde: no university-wide prohibition; course/examiner-level decisions
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1Göteborgs universitet förbjuder inte användning av generativ AI i utbildning. Istället är det upp till lärare och examinatorer att själva avgöra om, när och hur generativ AI kan användas i kursarbete och examinationer.
Ai Tool Treatment
Genormaliseerde waarde: Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for all staff/students; ChatGPT Edu for employees; extended Copilot by approved paid request
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1At present, all staff and students have access to the chat service Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat. In addition, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu. It is also possible to request access to the extended version of Copilot, Microsoft 365 Copilot; however, this service comes with a cost that is charged to the department or equivalent, and therefore an order requires approval from a manager.
Ai Tool Treatment
Genormaliseerde waarde: generative AI treated as a tool in examinations; first- and second-cycle study rules apply
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1När det gäller examinationer ser Göteborgs universitet generativ AI som ett verktyg och universitetets regler för studier på grundnivå och avancerad nivå tillämpas.
Source record
Bronnen: 6
pil.gu.se
studentportal.gu.se
pil.gu.se
studentportal.gu.se
pil.gu.se
studentportal.gu.se
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Gothenburg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-gothenburg
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Wijzigingslogboek openenSaved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.