Kingston upon Thames, United Kingdom

Kingston University, London

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen97%

Genormaliseerde waarde: unacceptable_genai_presenting_ai_content_without_acknowledgement_unless_assessment_brief_permits

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
The University defines the unacceptable use of Generative Artificial Intelligence as the act of presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools (such as text, media, tables etc - list not exhaustive), as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except where the nature of the assessment makes this permissible and is explicitly stated in the assessment brief.

Academic Integrity

Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%

Genormaliseerde waarde: generative_ai_editorial_process_use_must_be_acknowledged

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Where a Generative AI has been used as part of the editorial process, then this must be acknowledged by the student.

Academic Integrity

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%

Genormaliseerde waarde: ai_contributions_must_be_acknowledged

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Contributions by artificial intelligence (AI) tools must also be properly acknowledged.

Ai Tool Treatment

Kingston University's AG2 editorial-help guidance covers software tools including generative AI when students use third-party help in draft or final assessment work.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen92%

Genormaliseerde waarde: generative_ai_treated_as_possible_third_party_editorial_help

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
This guidance is for use when a student is considering whether to employ a third party such as a professional copy editing or proof-reading company or software tool (including generative artificial intelligence (GAI)) when producing work in draft or final version.

Source Status

Kingston University's 2025/26 regulation-change summary states that AR6 and AR7 introduced a formal definition of generative AI use within types of academic misconduct, and that AG2 became standalone guidance referencing AI and non-AI editorial help.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%

Genormaliseerde waarde: 2025_26_genai_academic_integrity_definition_and_ag2_editorial_help_source_status

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Introduction of a formal definition of use of generative artificial intelligence articulated within our current different types for academic misconduct. This guidance was previously published as an Annex within the Academic Integrity Procedures for Taught and Research degrees (AR6 and AR7) but has been reviewed as a new standalone document which references both AI and non-AI editorial help.

Source record

Officiële bronnen

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen97%Snapshot statusNiet gepubliceerdJSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Kingston University, London AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 18, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/kingston-university-london

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen