Seoul, South Korea

Chung-Ang University (CAU)

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

5 reviewed claims

Source Status

Chung-Ang University has an official Korean-language generative AI guidance page, established on 2023-04-20 and revised on 2024-04-09, administered by Library & Academic Information Services.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%

Genormaliseerde waarde: official_generative_ai_guidance_page

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
2023. 4. 20 제정; 2024. 4. 9 개정; 주무부서 : 학술정보원. ChatGPT 등 생성형 인공지능(Generative AI) 확산에 신속하게 대응하고, 대학 교육에서 교수 및 학습 윤리를 준수하며 생성형 AI를 활용하기 위한 가이드라인을 제시한다.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Established April 20, 2023; revised April 9, 2024; responsible office: Library & Academic Information Services. The guideline responds to generative AI such as ChatGPT and supports ethical teaching and learning use.

Onderwijs

CAU recommends that instructors choose one of three generative AI use options and state the selected approach in the syllabus.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen92%

Genormaliseerde waarde: instructor_selected_syllabus_ai_option

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
교수자는 생성형 AI 활용과 관련하여 다음 3가지 옵션 중 하나를 선택하여 강의계획서에 관련 내용을 명시하도록 권고한다.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Instructors are recommended to choose one of three options for generative AI use and state the related content in the syllabus.

Ai Tool Treatment

CAU's guidance frames generative AI course use as instructor-selected options: complete ban, use with prior instructor approval or citation, or full permission.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen91%

Genormaliseerde waarde: ban_approval_or_citation_full_permission

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
옵션 1) 생성형 AI 사용금지 ... 옵션 2) 교수자의 사전 승인 또는 출처 표기 후 생성형 AI 사용 가능 ... 옵션 3) 자유롭게 생성형 AI 사용 가능

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Option 1 bans generative AI use; Option 2 allows use with prior instructor approval or citation; Option 3 permits free use.

Academic Integrity

CAU's guidance says generative AI use can be considered academic misconduct when used in a class where AI is completely banned or when students fail to follow syllabus or instructor guidance.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%

Genormaliseerde waarde: misconduct_if_banned_or_instructor_guidance_violated

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
이 옵션을 선택할 경우, 학습자가 수업활동이나 과제 등을 수행하는 데 생성형 AI를 사용할 시 부정행위로 간주한다. ... 강의계획서에 명시된 지침 또는 교수자가 별도 제시한 지침을 준수하지 않거나 생성형 AI를 부적절하게 사용한 것으로 판단될 시, 부정행위로 간주될 수 있음을 인지한다.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

If the complete-ban option is selected, student use of generative AI for class activities or assignments is considered misconduct; students should understand that violating syllabus or instructor guidance may be considered misconduct.

Academic Integrity

CAU's student guidance says students are responsible for the integrity of outputs produced with generative AI and should verify the accuracy of those outputs.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen88%

Genormaliseerde waarde: student_responsibility_for_integrity_and_accuracy

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
생성형 AI를 이용한 결과물의 진실성에 대한 책임은 학습자에게 있음을 인지한다. 생성형 AI를 활용한 결과물에 대해서 사실여부를 확인하는 절차를 거친다.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Students should understand they are responsible for the integrity of outputs produced using generative AI and should verify whether those outputs are factual.

Source record

Officiële bronnen

1 source

Record information, JSON & citation
Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen94%Snapshot statusNiet gepubliceerdJSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Chung-Ang University (CAU) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/chung-ang-university-cau

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen