privacy
VU Amsterdam's framework says students cannot be required to use AI tools for which VU has no license, and students, lecturers, and support staff do not process personal data or other confidential data in AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 7 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
8 claim records
academic_integrity
VU Amsterdam's framework says AI detectors are not permitted because they are unreliable and do not meet VU privacy requirements.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
VU Amsterdam's framework says the lecturer or examiner indicates in the study guide, syllabus, or Canvas whether and how use of generative AI is allowed for a course, with course learning objectives remaining leading.
Review: Agent reviewed
research
VU Amsterdam's research guidance says GenAI use in research must meet scientific-research standards, take existing VU policies on ownership, scientific integrity, privacy, personal data, and knowledge security into account, and be transparent about which parts of research used GenAI.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
VU Amsterdam's Dutch academic-integrity page states that work made by generative AI is not the student's own work and lists using an AI writer to write an assignment as an example of fraud.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
VU Amsterdam's April 2025 Dutch framework describes the university's vision and policy for generative AI in education and gives faculties conditions for formulating their own faculty AI education policy.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
VU Amsterdam's student guidance states that Microsoft Copilot is available to VU students and staff through VU credentials, that teachers cannot force ChatGPT use, and that teachers may ask students to use Microsoft Copilot via the VU license.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
VU Amsterdam's Cogniti page describes Cogniti as an online-learning platform offered by VU where teachers or staff can create generative AI Agents for students, integrated into Canvas or used stand-alone at edubots.vu.nl in some cases.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
7 source attributions
Academische integriteit
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 1:10 PM
Cogniti
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 1:10 PM
Generative AI, Copilot and ChatGPT
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 1:10 PM
How to deal with ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot as a teacher
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 1:10 PM
Kader voor generatieve AI in het onderwijs
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 1:10 PM
Research and AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 1:10 PM
VU Education Lab AI Assistant
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 1:10 PM