Registergeschiedenis

Technical University of Munich

Updates van onze gecontroleerde gegevens bevestigen geen beleidswijziging van de universiteit.

De publicatiedatum van het register is geen ingangsdatum van universitair beleid.

Overeenkomende revisies: 6

  1. Pagina-update

    Pagina-update

    Revisie: v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027
    Revisie bekijken
    Overige gegevens · Pagina-update

    Pagina-update

    Geen vergelijkbare oude en nieuwe tekst beschikbaar.

    Nieuwe tekst

    Shared V6 reading layout and evidence presentation updated. University policy Claims, original evidence, held decisions and snapshot approvals remain unchanged; the institution audit remains PARTIAL.

    Revisiegeschiedenis openen
  2. Registeronderhoud

    Registeronderhoud

    Revisie: qs20-24-v6-r6-20261020
    Revisie bekijken
    Overige gegevens · Registeronderhoud

    Registeronderhoud

    Geen vergelijkbare oude en nieuwe tekst beschikbaar.

    Revisiegeschiedenis openen
  3. Sitecorrectie

    Betrokken gegevens: 1 (1 ongenummerde gegevens)

    Revisie: qs20-24-v6-r3-20261020
    Revisie bekijken

    Wat deze update betekent

    Gestructureerd registeroverzicht

    Betrokken gegevens: 1 (1 ongenummerde gegevens)

    Privacybescherming

    Voor deze revisie is nog geen onafhankelijk gecontroleerde samenvatting beschikbaar.

    Deze historische samenvatting bevestigt geen huidige toestemming of nieuwe universiteitsregel.

    Privacybescherming · Betrokken gegevens: 1 (1 ongenummerde gegevens)

    Sitecorrectie

    Geen vergelijkbare oude en nieuwe tekst beschikbaar.

    Nieuwe tekst

    TUM ProLehre guidance instructs students and instructors not to enter personal, sensitive, or confidential data into AI tools, including systems approved by TUM. Prohibited categories include names, matriculation numbers, email addresses, patient records, research participant data, exam data, and confidential research results. Users are instructed to anonymize content prior to entry, utilize generalized or neutral sample texts, and consult instructors or the TUM Data Protection Officer when uncertain.

    Revisiegeschiedenis openen
  4. Sitecorrectie · Registeraanvulling

    Betrokken gegevens: 11 (4 gecorrigeerd / aangepast · 7 toegevoegd)

    Revisie: qs23-24-v6-r3-20261019
    Revisie bekijken

    Wat deze update betekent

    Gestructureerd registeroverzicht

    Betrokken gegevens: 11 (4 gecorrigeerd / aangepast · 7 toegevoegd)

    Goedgekeurde hulpmiddelen · Academische integriteit · 5 andere onderwerpen

    Voor deze revisie is nog geen onafhankelijk gecontroleerde samenvatting beschikbaar.

    Deze historische samenvatting bevestigt geen huidige toestemming of nieuwe universiteitsregel.

    Cursusopdrachten · Betrokken gegevens: 3 (2 gecorrigeerd / aangepast · 1 toegevoegd)

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    TUM ProLehre student guidance specifies that generative AI tools may be used for written coursework, term papers, essays, and theses only when AI tool use is explicitly permitted for that specific assessment by the instructor or module specifications. Where no statement regarding AI use is made in the assignment or module handbook, students are strongly advised to ask the instructor in advance; using AI without permission may be treated as attempted deception under APSO § 22 or comparable regulations. When authorized, transparent documentation of tool use and prompts is commonly required, and students retain full personal responsibility for submitted work.

    Sitecorrectie

    Tekstwijzigingen in conclusies van de site
    Oude tekst

    TUM ProLehre guidance says instructors at TUM have broad discretion when deciding whether and how AI is used in teaching, and that related rules should be didactically grounded and communicated transparently to students.

    Nieuwe tekst

    TUM ProLehre guidance states that instructors have broad pedagogical discretion when deciding whether and how AI is used in their courses, and that related rules should be didactically grounded and communicated transparently to students. In student guidance for written coursework (Hausarbeiten, essays, and assessed written work), ProLehre establishes that students are authorized to use AI tools only when AI use is explicitly permitted for that specific assessment.

    Sitecorrectie

    Tekstwijzigingen in conclusies van de site
    Oude tekst

    When AI use is restricted, TUM ProLehre guidance tells instructors to clearly define what AI may be used for, what it may not be used for, and to discuss this with students.

    Nieuwe tekst

    When AI use is restricted or permitted with conditions, TUM ProLehre guidance directs instructors to clearly specify what activities AI is permitted for, what is prohibited, and to discuss these boundaries with students. In student guidance, ProLehre advises that if no AI specifications are provided in the task description or module handbook, students should ask the instructor in advance rather than assuming permission, noting that unauthorized use may be treated as deception under APSO § 22 or comparable regulations.

    Examens · Betrokken gegevens: 1 (1 toegevoegd)

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    In the APSO reading version as amended by the12th amending statute, §22(1) says attempting to influence an examination result through deception or unauthorized aids leads to a failing grade. Suitable software may check unacknowledged text or sources, while the examiner determines whether deception occurred. Under §22(2), disruption may lead to exclusion from that examination and a failing grade. In serious or repeated deception or disruption cases, the examination committee may exclude the student from further examinations in the degree program, with final failure of the degree examination (§22(3)). Under §24(6), an examination failed because of §22 deception or disruption may be retaken only once. These are general examination provisions, not a separate AI-specific sanction schedule.

    Vermelding van gebruik · Betrokken gegevens: 1 (1 toegevoegd)

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    The Guidelines for Writing Theses and Seminar Papers (Juli 2026) issued by the TUM Chair of Marketing and Consumer Research permit the use of generative AI tools (such as ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity) as research aids for seminar, Bachelor's, and Master's theses, subject to mandatory declaration inserted before the bibliography. The declaration requires students to specify the exact tools used and the specific tasks performed (brainstorming, literature search, structuring, code generation, hypothesis generation, translation, image generation, or language improvement), and confirm that they personally reviewed the entire thesis and accept full responsibility. If no AI tools were used, a formal non-use statement must be included ('Ich habe keine generativen KI-Tools oder -Hilfsmittel verwendet.'). AI-generated images must cite the specific tool, and the use of AI for empirical data collection and analysis is prohibited for data protection reasons unless explicitly approved by the thesis supervisor. These are the reviewed chair guidelines; no broader TUM rule established.

    Gegevensveiligheid · Betrokken gegevens: 2 (2 toegevoegd)

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    TUM ProLehre guidance instructs students and instructors not to enter personal, sensitive, or confidential data into AI tools, including systems approved by TUM. Prohibited categories include names, matriculation numbers, email addresses, patient records, research participant data, exam data, and confidential research results. Users are instructed to anonymize content prior to entry, utilize generalized or neutral sample texts, and consult instructors or the TUM Data Protection Officer when uncertain.

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    TUM ProLehre student guidance specifies that teaching and study materials such as lecture slides, scripts, recordings, or past exams are generally protected intellectual property and may only be uploaded to or processed in AI tools with explicit instructor consent. This consent requirement applies even when materials are uploaded solely for personal study purposes, including summarization, transcription, or translation. Where AI tools are used to enhance accessibility of learning materials, such as transcribing a lecture recording due to an impairment, ProLehre recommends consulting the instructor or academic advising in advance.

    Goedgekeurde hulpmiddelen · Betrokken gegevens: 1 (1 gecorrigeerd / aangepast)

    Sitecorrectie

    Tekstwijzigingen in conclusies van de site
    Oude tekst

    M365 Copilot Chat is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Nieuwe tekst

    TUM's digitalization announcement states that M365 services and M365 Copilot Chat can be used after activation in TUMonline. Tool activation does not establish assessment permission: ProLehre's written-work guidance requires explicit permission for the specific assessment, and its data guidance instructs users not to enter personal, sensitive or confidential data even into TUM-approved tools. Individual cost is not established in these reviewed sources.

    Onderzoek en publicatie · Betrokken gegevens: 1 (1 toegevoegd)

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    The reviewed TUM-SGwP statute requires researchers working at TUM to follow recognized scientific standards, document work, question results and act honestly (§1). Supervisors must verifiably give the statute to students conducting scientific thesis work (§22). Under §8, primary and evaluated data and evaluation software used for publications must be kept on durable secure media in the originating institution; retention depends on discipline and is ordinarily ten years from the relevant publication, with reasons for non-retention or shorter periods documented. Authorship requires a genuine, traceable contribution and honorary authorship is prohibited (§12). Under §13, scientific misconduct involves knowingly or grossly negligently making false statements, violating others' intellectual property or impairing their research in a scientifically relevant context. Anyone may approach the ombudsperson concerning suspected misconduct (§16).

    Academische integriteit · Betrokken gegevens: 2 (1 gecorrigeerd / aangepast · 1 toegevoegd)

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    In the reviewed APSO reading version, §25(3) grants access to written examination work, examiner reports and oral-examination minutes on a reasoned written application after results are announced. The application must reach the examination committee chair within one month of announcement; the chair determines the time and place with the examiner. Under §21, examination-procedure defects must be raised promptly in writing to the committee chair or examiner. This inspection window does not establish a deadline for disciplinary or administrative appeals, which remain unreviewed.

    Sitecorrectie

    Tekstwijzigingen in conclusies van de site
    Oude tekst

    TUM ProLehre guidance says reliable control of AI use is difficult to impossible, and recommends designing assessments so unauthorized AI use does not provide a decisive advantage.

    Nieuwe tekst

    TUM ProLehre guidance observes that reliable control of AI use is difficult to impossible and recommends designing assessments so that unauthorized AI use offers no decisive advantage. This is pedagogical guidance; it does not itself determine whether an individual student committed misconduct.

    Revisiegeschiedenis openen
  5. Historisch · reden niet ingedeeld · Registeraanvulling

    Betrokken gegevens: 7 (1 toegevoegd)

    Revisie: public-release-20260715-005
    Revisie bekijken

    Wat deze update betekent

    Gestructureerd registeroverzicht

    Betrokken gegevens: 7 (1 toegevoegd)

    Regels voor AI-tools

    Voor deze revisie is nog geen onafhankelijk gecontroleerde samenvatting beschikbaar.

    Deze historische samenvatting bevestigt geen huidige toestemming of nieuwe universiteitsregel.

    Regels voor AI-tools · Betrokken gegevens: 7 (1 toegevoegd)

    Historisch · reden niet ingedeeld

    Geen vergelijkbare oude en nieuwe tekst beschikbaar.

    Nieuwe tekst

    Grammarly is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Historisch · reden niet ingedeeld

    Geen vergelijkbare oude en nieuwe tekst beschikbaar.

    Oude tekst

    Grammarly is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    M365 Copilot Chat is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Historisch · reden niet ingedeeld

    Geen vergelijkbare oude en nieuwe tekst beschikbaar.

    Oude tekst

    M365 Copilot Chat is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    Historisch · reden niet ingedeeld

    Geen vergelijkbare oude en nieuwe tekst beschikbaar.

    Oude tekst

    OneTutor is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Historisch · reden niet ingedeeld

    Geen vergelijkbare oude en nieuwe tekst beschikbaar.

    Oude tekst

    Artemis is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Historisch · reden niet ingedeeld

    Geen vergelijkbare oude en nieuwe tekst beschikbaar.

    Oude tekst

    Iris is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Historisch bewijs of classificatie is onvolledig; bekijk de geschiedenis.

    Revisiegeschiedenis openen
  6. Registeraanvulling

    Betrokken gegevens: 5 (5 toegevoegd)

    Revisie: public-release-20260701-001
    Revisie bekijken

    Wat deze update betekent

    Gestructureerd registeroverzicht

    Betrokken gegevens: 5 (5 toegevoegd)

    Regels voor AI-tools

    Voor deze revisie is nog geen onafhankelijk gecontroleerde samenvatting beschikbaar.

    Deze historische samenvatting bevestigt geen huidige toestemming of nieuwe universiteitsregel.

    Regels voor AI-tools · Betrokken gegevens: 5 (5 toegevoegd)

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    Grammarly is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    M365 Copilot Chat is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    OneTutor is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    Artemis is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Registeraanvulling

    Toegevoegd

    Iris is listed for Technical University of Munich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Revisiegeschiedenis openen