ai_tool_treatment
Lund University's Swedish generative AI policy encourages staff and students to explore and use generative AI responsibly and creatively within the stated policy principles.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Lund University
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Lund University currently has 10 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Lund University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Lund University combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+20-0
11 # Lund University AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: Lund University's Swedish generative AI policy encourages staff and students to explore and use generative AI responsibly and creatively within the stated policy principles.
3+Evidence (sv, 9f79df69b0f3): Lunds universitet uppmuntrar alla medarbetare och studenter att utforska och använda generativ AI på ett ansvarsfullt och kreativt sätt inom de ramar som framgår av här angivna principer.
4+teaching: Lund University's Swedish policy says generative AI use is to support learning and research and does not replace basic skills, critical thinking, or scientific method.
5+Evidence (sv, 9f79df69b0f3): Stöd i lärande och forskning. Användning av generativ AI ska stödja lärande och forskning och ersätter inte grundläggande färdigheter, kritiskt tänkande eller vetenskaplig metod.
6+academic_integrity: Lund University's Swedish policy says staff and students are responsible for all content they produce, including when generative AI has been used as support.
7+Evidence (sv, 9f79df69b0f3): Medarbetare och studenter är ansvariga för allt innehåll de producerar, oavsett om generativ AI har använts som stöd. Det är den enskildes ansvar att säkerställa att materialet uppfyller krav på korrekthet och akademisk integritet.
8+procurement: Lund University's Swedish policy says generative AI use is to comply with privacy and security laws and that procured tools or existing licensing agreements should be used in the first instance.
9+Evidence (sv, 9f79df69b0f3): Användning av generativ AI ska följa lagar om integritet och säkerhet. Vid användning av generativ AI ska i första hand upphandlade verktyg användas eller avropade inom befintliga licensavtal.
10+academic_integrity: Lund University's student guidance says students who want to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or examination must check whether it is permitted and how to report its use; presenting GenAI-generated work as one's own may be treated as cheating.
11+Evidence (en, d98e2627a0c4): If you wish to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or in an examination, you must always double-check with the teacher whether it is permitted and, if so, how you should report its use. Even if it is not clearly stated in the course materials that GenAI is prohibited, it may still be considered cheating if you make it appear as though you have created something yourself that a GenAI tool has generated for you.
12+privacy: Lund University's staff AI page says users may not write or upload sensitive material or sensitive personal data to ChatGPT, and may never upload medical information regardless of confidentiality status.
13+Evidence (en, 0898924449cb): You may not write or upload sensitive material or sensitive personal data according to GDPR, such as: health information; ethnic origin; political opinions; religious beliefs; trade union membership; sex life or sexual orientation; biometric or genetic data. You may also never upload medical information regardless of confidentiality status.
14+teaching: Lund University's GenAI Q&A says generative AI tools are permissible in education when teachers believe they contribute to or facilitate learning, with teachers responsible for informing students about course or programme rules.
15+Evidence (en, f63436f46cef): At Lund University, it is permissible to use generative AI tools in education if you believe they can contribute to or facilitate learning. However, there are some important things to consider. As a teacher, you need to: be able to confirm that students have achieved the program's and course's learning objectives; be aware that sharing students' work with GAI tools is not allowed; ensure that every student has equal access to the GAI tools you recommend; inform students about the risks of sharing personal information or copyrighted material with the tools; inform students about the rules for using GAI tools in the course or program.
16+teaching: Lund University's teacher guidance says teachers should inform students after deciding how GenAI products may be used in teaching and should explain whether and how students can use GenAI products in their work.
17+Evidence (en, 811076a3f7b5): Once you have reviewed learning objectives and made decisions about the use of GenAI products in teaching, you must inform your students. Be clear about whether and, if so, how students can use GenAI products in their work. It is also important to inform students about the consequences of unauthorized use of GenAI products:
18+privacy: Lund University's student guidance says students should primarily use Lund-licensed tools such as Microsoft Copilot Chat and Google Gemini, and must not upload other students' work, sensitive personal data, or copyright-protected material.
19+Evidence (en, d98e2627a0c4): When studying, you should primarily use the tools for which Lund University holds licences. As a student at Lund University, you can use Microsoft Copilot Chat and Google Gemini by logging in with your student account. However, even if you are logged in with your student account, you must never upload, for example, other students' work, sensitive personal data or copyright-protected material - this applies to text as well as images, audio or video.
20+procurement: Lund University's staff AI page says ChatGPT is available free of charge to teachers and researchers for one year through ChatGPT Edu.
21+Evidence (en, 0898924449cb): ChatGPT is available free of charge to the university's teachers and researchers for one year via ChatGPT Edu. This provides access to powerful generative AI support for analysis, problem-solving, and development work - within a more secure environment tailored for academic activities.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
10 claim records
teaching
Lund University's Swedish policy says generative AI use is to support learning and research and does not replace basic skills, critical thinking, or scientific method.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Lund University's Swedish policy says staff and students are responsible for all content they produce, including when generative AI has been used as support.
Review: Agent reviewed
procurement
Lund University's Swedish policy says generative AI use is to comply with privacy and security laws and that procured tools or existing licensing agreements should be used in the first instance.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Lund University's student guidance says students who want to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or examination must check whether it is permitted and how to report its use; presenting GenAI-generated work as one's own may be treated as cheating.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Lund University's staff AI page says users may not write or upload sensitive material or sensitive personal data to ChatGPT, and may never upload medical information regardless of confidentiality status.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Lund University's GenAI Q&A says generative AI tools are permissible in education when teachers believe they contribute to or facilitate learning, with teachers responsible for informing students about course or programme rules.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Lund University's teacher guidance says teachers should inform students after deciding how GenAI products may be used in teaching and should explain whether and how students can use GenAI products in their work.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Lund University's student guidance says students should primarily use Lund-licensed tools such as Microsoft Copilot Chat and Google Gemini, and must not upload other students' work, sensitive personal data, or copyright-protected material.
Review: Agent reviewed
procurement
Lund University's staff AI page says ChatGPT is available free of charge to teachers and researchers for one year through ChatGPT Edu.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
5 source attributions
AI at Lund University
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:34 AM
Guidance for teachers in five steps
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:34 AM
How to use generative AI responsibly
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:34 AM
Policy med principer för användning av generativ AI inom Lunds universitet
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:34 AM
Questions and answers on GenAI tools
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:34 AM